Re: [PATCH 03/11] softfloat: Introduce float_flag_inorm_denormal

[Richard Henderson]

On 6/7/21 8:35 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> So I'm guessing Emilio had the original flush code split was to avoid
> multiple checks against s->flush_inputs_to_zero in the code. The was
> possibly a good reason, comparing the before/after of float32_mul:

I assumed that the most important thing now is that we test floatN_is_denormal 
only once -- the test for flush_inputs_to_zero is fairly trivial.

If you've got a better ordering of operations for this, do tell.


r~