qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] docs/devel/testing: add -gdb option to the debuggin


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/15] docs/devel/testing: add -gdb option to the debugging section of QEMU iotests
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 20:16:51 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2

20.05.2021 10:52, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

---
  docs/devel/testing.rst | 11 +++++++++++
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/devel/testing.rst b/docs/devel/testing.rst
index 8144e316a4..a746cab745 100644
--- a/docs/devel/testing.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/testing.rst
@@ -229,6 +229,17 @@ Debugging a test case
  The following options to the ``check`` script can be useful when debugging
  a failing test:
+* ``-gdb`` wraps every QEMU invocation in a ``gdbserver``, which waits for a
+  connection from a gdb client.  The options given to ``gdbserver`` (e.g. the
+  address on which to listen for connections) are taken from the 
``$GDB_OPTIONS``
+  environment variable.  By default (if ``$GDB_OPTIONS`` is empty), it listens 
on
+  ``localhost:12345``.
+  It is possible to connect to it for example with
+  ``gdb -iex "target remote $addr"``, where ``$addr`` is the address
+  ``gdbserver`` listens on.
+  If the ``-gdb`` option is not used, ``$GDB_OPTIONS`` is ignored,
+  regardless on whether it is set or not.
+
  * ``-d`` (debug) just increases the logging verbosity, showing
    for example the QMP commands and answers.

Didn't you think of an interface as simple as just wrap qemu binary by "gdb --args" 
and redirect stdin and stdout directly to the terminal where test is running? Wouldn't it more 
convenient? So, you just start ./check -gdb <test>, and you are in gdb. Or you need 
exactly gdb server, to attach from another machine?

Keeping this possibility in mind, it's probably better to call you option 
"-gdbserver"... But we can rename later if needed, finally, it's only a test 
framework.


--
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]