qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] co-shared-resource: protect with a mutex


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] co-shared-resource: protect with a mutex
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 17:50:28 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1

18.05.2021 12:40, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
co-shared-resource is currently not thread-safe, as also reported
in co-shared-resource.h. Add a QemuMutex because co_try_get_from_shres
can also be invoked from non-coroutine context.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
  include/qemu/co-shared-resource.h |  4 +---
  util/qemu-co-shared-resource.c    | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/qemu/co-shared-resource.h 
b/include/qemu/co-shared-resource.h
index 4e4503004c..78ca5850f8 100644
--- a/include/qemu/co-shared-resource.h
+++ b/include/qemu/co-shared-resource.h
@@ -26,15 +26,13 @@
  #ifndef QEMU_CO_SHARED_RESOURCE_H
  #define QEMU_CO_SHARED_RESOURCE_H
-
+/* Accesses to co-shared-resource API are thread-safe */
  typedef struct SharedResource SharedResource;
/*
   * Create SharedResource structure
   *
   * @total: total amount of some resource to be shared between clients
- *
- * Note: this API is not thread-safe.
   */
  SharedResource *shres_create(uint64_t total);
diff --git a/util/qemu-co-shared-resource.c b/util/qemu-co-shared-resource.c
index 1c83cd9d29..bb875a86be 100644
--- a/util/qemu-co-shared-resource.c
+++ b/util/qemu-co-shared-resource.c
@@ -28,10 +28,13 @@
  #include "qemu/co-shared-resource.h"
struct SharedResource {
-    uint64_t total;
-    uint64_t available;
+    uint64_t total; /* Set in shres_create() and not changed anymore */
+ /* State fields protected by lock */
+    uint64_t available;
      CoQueue queue;
+
+    QemuMutex lock;
  };
SharedResource *shres_create(uint64_t total)
@@ -40,6 +43,7 @@ SharedResource *shres_create(uint64_t total)
s->total = s->available = total;
      qemu_co_queue_init(&s->queue);
+    qemu_mutex_init(&s->lock);
return s;
  }
@@ -47,10 +51,12 @@ SharedResource *shres_create(uint64_t total)
  void shres_destroy(SharedResource *s)
  {
      assert(s->available == s->total);
+    qemu_mutex_destroy(&s->lock);
      g_free(s);
  }
-bool co_try_get_from_shres(SharedResource *s, uint64_t n)
+/* Called with lock held. */
+static bool co_try_get_from_shres_locked(SharedResource *s, uint64_t n)
  {
      if (s->available >= n) {
          s->available -= n;
@@ -60,16 +66,27 @@ bool co_try_get_from_shres(SharedResource *s, uint64_t n)
      return false;
  }
+bool co_try_get_from_shres(SharedResource *s, uint64_t n)
+{
+    bool res;
+    QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&s->lock);
+    res = co_try_get_from_shres_locked(s, n);
+
+    return res;
+}

it can be two lines:

QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&s->lock);
return co_try_get_from_shres_locked(s, n);

+
  void coroutine_fn co_get_from_shres(SharedResource *s, uint64_t n)
  {
      assert(n <= s->total);
-    while (!co_try_get_from_shres(s, n)) {
-        qemu_co_queue_wait(&s->queue, NULL);
+    QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&s->lock);
+    while (!co_try_get_from_shres_locked(s, n)) {
+        qemu_co_queue_wait(&s->queue, &s->lock);
      }
  }
void coroutine_fn co_put_to_shres(SharedResource *s, uint64_t n)
  {
+    QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&s->lock);
      assert(s->total - s->available >= n);
      s->available += n;
      qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&s->queue);


Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>


--
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]