[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug 1912107] Re: Option to constrain linux-user exec() to emulated CPU
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
[Bug 1912107] Re: Option to constrain linux-user exec() to emulated CPU only |
Date: |
Fri, 14 May 2021 19:28:44 -0000 |
This is an automated cleanup. This bug report has been moved to QEMU's
new bug tracker on gitlab.com and thus gets marked as 'expired' now.
Please continue with the discussion here:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/306
** Changed in: qemu
Status: New => Expired
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues #306
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/306
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912107
Title:
Option to constrain linux-user exec() to emulated CPU only
Status in QEMU:
Expired
Bug description:
When trying to reproduce a bug someone reported on an actual AMD K10[1], I
tried to directly throw `qemu_x86-64 -cpu
phenom path/to/wrongly-labelled-instruction-set/gcc 1.c` at the problem, but
failed to get an "illegal instruction" as expected. A quick investigation
reveals that the error is actually caused by one of gcc's child processess, and
that the said process is being ran directly on the host. A similar problem
happens with trying to call stuff with /usr/bin/env.
[1]: https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/issues/1034
Since both the host and the guest are x86_64, I deemed binfmt
inapplicable to my case. I believe that QEMU should offer a way to
modify exec() and other spawning syscalls so that execution remains on
an emulated CPU in such a case. Call it an extra layer of binfmt, if
you must.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1912107/+subscriptions