qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add a proper prototype for main()


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Add a proper prototype for main()
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:09:43 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0

On 12/05/2021 21.54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 5/12/21 7:15 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
Older versions of Clang complain if there is no prototype for main().
Add one, and while we're at it, make sure that we use the same type
for main.c and netmain.c - since the return value does not matter,
declare the return type of main() as "void".

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c     | 3 +--
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h | 1 +
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
index 5d2b7ba94d..835341457d 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static void probe_boot_device(void)
      sclp_print("Could not find a suitable boot device (none specified)\n");
  }
-int main(void)
+void main(void)
  {
      sclp_setup();
      css_setup();
@@ -294,5 +294,4 @@ int main(void)
      }
panic("Failed to load OS from hard disk\n");
-    return 0; /* make compiler happy */
  }
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
index 79db69ff54..b88e0550ab 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ void write_subsystem_identification(void);
  void write_iplb_location(void);
  extern char stack[PAGE_SIZE * 8] __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
  unsigned int get_loadparm_index(void);
+void main(void);

Can we keep the forward declaration in the source?

There are two main() functions, one in main.c and one in netmain.c, that's why I think it's better to declare the prototype only in one place, i.e. in a header?

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]