[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure:
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2) |
Date: |
Wed, 12 May 2021 16:51:25 +0200 |
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 4:00 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 03:55:59PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 12/05/2021 15.47, Willian Rampazzo wrote:
> > > I don't know if you saw this:
> > > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/billing-overview/#partner-queue-solution.
> > >
> > > tl;dr, Travis now has support from partners to run non-x86 arch. It is
> > > always good to have a plan B, like qemu own CI runners, but, at least,
> > > with these non-x86 arch available on Travis, we will have some time to
> > > breathe.
> "The build job under Partner Queue Solution costs 0 credits per
> started minute. At the moment of introducing Partner Queue Solution
> active accounts on the Usage based Plans, including the Free Plan,
> with a balance of zero or fewer credits, balance is updated to
> hold 1 credit. Thus everybody can use Partner Queues without
> requesting Travis CI support to grant additional credits. If you
> run into a negative account balance after that, you still need to
> file an additional request."
>
> IOW, anyone ought to be able to use non-x86 jobs, bt if you accidentally
> run an x86 job and get into 0 (or negative) credits, then you won't even
> be able to use non-x86 jobs.
You once showed a script on GitLab triggering Travis-CI jobs and reporting
the success/failure on GitLab (or was it Cirrus-CI?). Is it possible to use
something similar with QEMU to integrate Travis-CI jobs with GitLab
pipeline?
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2, Willian Rampazzo, 2021/05/11
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2, Richard Henderson, 2021/05/11
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/05/12
- non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2), Thomas Huth, 2021/05/12
- Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2), Willian Rampazzo, 2021/05/12
- Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2), Thomas Huth, 2021/05/12
- Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2), Willian Rampazzo, 2021/05/12
- Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2), Thomas Huth, 2021/05/12
- Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2), Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/05/12
- Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2),
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=
- Re: non-x86 runners in the Gitlab-CI (was: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2), Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/05/12
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/05/12
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/05/12
- Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/05/12
Re: [PATCH 00/12] Wave goodbye to RHEL 7 vintage distros, Thomas Huth, 2021/05/11
Re: [PATCH 00/12] Wave goodbye to RHEL 7 vintage distros, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/05/13