[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] linux-user/s390x: some signal fixes
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] linux-user/s390x: some signal fixes |
Date: |
Thu, 6 May 2021 15:31:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 |
Le 06/05/2021 à 13:54, Cornelia Huck a écrit :
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:33:53 -0700
> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Version 2 splits lazy do-it-all patch.
>> Patch 1 has an additional fix, so I dropped the r-b.
>>
>> r~
>>
>> Richard Henderson (15):
>> linux-user/s390x: Fix sigframe types
>> linux-user/s390x: Use uint16_t for signal retcode
>> linux-user/s390x: Remove PSW_ADDR_AMODE
>> linux-user/s390x: Remove restore_sigregs return value
>> linux-user/s390x: Fix trace in restore_regs
>> linux-user/s390x: Fix sigcontext sregs value
>> linux-user/s390x: Use tswap_sigset in setup_rt_frame
>> linux-user/s390x: Tidy save_sigregs
>> linux-user/s390x: Clean up single-use gotos in signal.c
>> linux-user/s390x: Set psw.mask properly for the signal handler
>> linux-user/s390x: Add stub sigframe argument for last_break
>> linux-user/s390x: Fix frame_addr corruption in setup_frame
>> linux-user/s390x: Add build asserts for sigset sizes
>> linux-user/s390x: Clean up signal.c
>> linux-user/s390x: Handle vector regs in signal stack
>>
>> linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 280 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I assume the route-to-upstream for this is through the linux-user tree
> and not the s390x tree, right?
>
Yes, and I'll try to do a PR soon.
Thanks,
Laurent