qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] hw/acpi/aml-build: Add processor hierarchy node s


From: Andrew Jones
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] hw/acpi/aml-build: Add processor hierarchy node structure
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:37:20 +0200

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:07:43PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> Add a generic API to build Processor Hierarchy Node Structure(Type 0),
> which is strictly consistent with descriptions in ACPI 6.3: 5.2.29.1.
> 
> This function will be used to build ACPI PPTT table for cpu topology.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ying Fang <fangying1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Henglong Fan <fanhenglong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/acpi/aml-build.c         | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> index d33ce8954a..75e01aea17 100644
> --- a/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> +++ b/hw/acpi/aml-build.c
> @@ -1916,6 +1916,33 @@ void build_slit(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker 
> *linker, MachineState *ms,
>                   table_data->len - slit_start, 1, oem_id, oem_table_id);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * ACPI 6.3: 5.2.29.1 Processor Hierarchy Node Structure (Type 0)
             ^ Doesn't this table show up in 6.2 first? We should always
use the oldest specification we can.

Also, please don't capitalize Hierarchy, Node, and Structure. Those words
are not capitalized in the spec section name and we want an exact match
here.

> + */
> +void build_processor_hierarchy_node(GArray *tbl, uint32_t flags,
> +                                    uint32_t parent, uint32_t id,
> +                                    uint32_t *priv_rsrc, uint32_t priv_num)
> +{
> +    int i;
> +
> +    build_append_byte(tbl, 0);                 /* Type 0 - processor */
> +    build_append_byte(tbl, 20 + priv_num * 4); /* Length */
> +    build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, 0, 2);      /* Reserved */
> +    build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, flags, 4);  /* Flags */
> +    build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, parent, 4); /* Parent */
> +    build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, id, 4);     /* ACPI processor ID */
                                                          ^ should be
capitalized like in the spec
                        
> +
> +    /* Number of private resources */
> +    build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, priv_num, 4);
> +
> +    /* Private resources[N] */
> +    if (priv_num > 0 && priv_rsrc != NULL) {

Since we should never have priv_num > 0 and priv_rsrc == NULL, then we can
do

   if (priv_num > 0) {
       assert(priv_rsrc);
       ...

> +        for (i = 0; i < priv_num; i++) {
> +            build_append_int_noprefix(tbl, priv_rsrc[i], 4);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /* build rev1/rev3/rev5.1 FADT */ 
>  void build_fadt(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, const AcpiFadtData *f,
>                  const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id)
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> index 471266d739..ea74b8f6ed 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/aml-build.h
> @@ -462,6 +462,10 @@ void build_srat_memory(AcpiSratMemoryAffinity *numamem, 
> uint64_t base,
>  void build_slit(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, MachineState *ms,
>                  const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id);
>  
> +void build_processor_hierarchy_node(GArray *tbl, uint32_t flags,
> +                                    uint32_t parent, uint32_t id,
> +                                    uint32_t *priv_rsrc, uint32_t priv_num);
> +
>  void build_fadt(GArray *tbl, BIOSLinker *linker, const AcpiFadtData *f,
>                  const char *oem_id, const char *oem_table_id);
>  
> -- 
> 2.19.1
>

Thanks,
drew 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]