qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qdev: Separate implementations of qdev_get_machine() for


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] qdev: Separate implementations of qdev_get_machine() for user and system
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:25:42 -0400

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 06:03:38PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> Despite its simple name and common usage of "getting a pointer to
> the machine" in system-mode emulation, qdev_get_machine() has some
> subtilities.
> 
> First, it can be called when running user-mode emulation : this is
> because user-mode partly relies on qdev to instantiate its CPU
> model.

Do we know exactly which user mode emulation code needs to call
qdev_get_machine(), and why?

If there's no real MachineState object in user mode, what the
return value of qdev_get_machine() is used for?

> 
> Second, but not least, it has a side-effect : if it cannot find an
> object at "/machine" in the QOM tree, it creates a dummy "container"
> object and put it there. A simple check on the type returned by
> qdev_get_machine() allows user-mode to run the common qdev code,
> skipping the parts that only make sense for system-mode.
> 
> This side-effect turns out to complicate the use of qdev_get_machine()
> for the system-mode case though. Most notably, qdev_get_machine() must
> not be called before the machine object is added to the QOM tree by
> qemu_create_machine(), otherwise the existing dummy "container" object
> would cause qemu_create_machine() to fail with something like :
> 
> Unexpected error in object_property_try_add() at ../../qom/object.c:1223:
> qemu-system-ppc64: attempt to add duplicate property 'machine' to
>  object (type 'container')
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> This situation doesn't exist in the current code base, mostly because
> of preventive fixing of some "latent bugs" in QEMU 4.0 (see 1a3ec8c1564
> and e2fb3fbbf9c for details).
> 
> A new kind of breakage was spotted very recently though :
> 
> $ ./qemu-system-ppc64 -device power8_v2.0-spapr-cpu-core,help
> /home/thuth/devel/qemu/include/hw/boards.h:24:
>  MACHINE: Object 0x5635bd53af10 is not an instance of type machine
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> This comes from the change 3df261b6676b in QEMU 5.0. It unwillingly
> added a new condition for qdev_get_machine() to be called too early,
> breaking MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()) in generic cpu-core code this
> time.
> 
> In order to avoid further subtle breakages like this, change the
> implentation of qdev_get_machine() to:
> - keep the existing behaviour of creating the dummy "container"
>   object for the user-mode case only ;
> - abort() if the machine doesn't exist yet in the QOM tree for
>   the system-mode case. This gives a precise hint to developpers
>   that calling qdev_get_machine() too early is a programming bug.
> 
> This is achieved with a new do_qdev_get_machine() function called
> from qdev_get_machine(), with different implementations for system
> and user mode.
> 
> $ ./qemu-system-ppc64 -device power8_v2.0-spapr-cpu-core,help
> qemu-system-ppc64: ../../hw/core/machine.c:1290:
>  qdev_get_machine: Assertion `machine != NULL' failed.
> Aborted (core dumped)
> 
> Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> ---
>  hw/core/machine.c        | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  hw/core/qdev.c           |  2 +-
>  include/hw/qdev-core.h   |  1 +
>  stubs/meson.build        |  1 +
>  stubs/qdev-get-machine.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 stubs/qdev-get-machine.c
> 
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index 40def78183a7..fecca4023105 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -1293,6 +1293,20 @@ void qdev_machine_creation_done(void)
>      register_global_state();
>  }
>  
> +Object *do_qdev_get_machine(void)
> +{
> +    Object *machine;
> +
> +    machine = object_resolve_path_component(object_get_root(), "machine");

What about just replacing this expression with `current_machine`?

> +    /*
> +     * qdev_get_machine() shouldn't be called before qemu_create_machine()
> +     * has created the "/machine" path.
> +     */
> +    assert(machine != NULL);
> +
> +    return machine;

> +}
> +
>  static const TypeInfo machine_info = {
>      .name = TYPE_MACHINE,
>      .parent = TYPE_OBJECT,
> diff --git a/hw/core/qdev.c b/hw/core/qdev.c
> index cefc5eaa0a92..1122721b2bf0 100644
> --- a/hw/core/qdev.c
> +++ b/hw/core/qdev.c
> @@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ Object *qdev_get_machine(void)
>      static Object *dev;

It's interesting how this variable simply duplicates the purpose
of `current_machine`.

>  
>      if (dev == NULL) {
> -        dev = container_get(object_get_root(), "/machine");
> +        dev = do_qdev_get_machine();
>      }
>  
>      return dev;
> diff --git a/include/hw/qdev-core.h b/include/hw/qdev-core.h
> index bafc311bfa1b..90e295e0bc1a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/qdev-core.h
> +++ b/include/hw/qdev-core.h
> @@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ const char *qdev_fw_name(DeviceState *dev);
>  
>  void qdev_assert_realized_properly(void);
>  Object *qdev_get_machine(void);
> +Object *do_qdev_get_machine(void);
>  
>  /* FIXME: make this a link<> */
>  bool qdev_set_parent_bus(DeviceState *dev, BusState *bus, Error **errp);
> diff --git a/stubs/meson.build b/stubs/meson.build
> index be6f6d609e58..b99ee2b33e94 100644
> --- a/stubs/meson.build
> +++ b/stubs/meson.build
> @@ -54,3 +54,4 @@ if have_system
>  else
>    stub_ss.add(files('qdev.c'))
>  endif
> +stub_ss.add(files('qdev-get-machine.c'))
> diff --git a/stubs/qdev-get-machine.c b/stubs/qdev-get-machine.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ed4cdaa01900
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/stubs/qdev-get-machine.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
> +#include "hw/qdev-core.h"
> +
> +Object *do_qdev_get_machine(void)
> +{
> +    /*
> +     * This will create a "container" and add it to the QOM tree, if there
> +     * isn't one already.
> +     */
> +    return container_get(object_get_root(), "/machine");
> +}

I'm curious to understand when exactly this stub is useful.

-- 
Eduardo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]