On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:52:54PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
On 07/04/2021 16:14, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:20:18AM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
On 31/03/2021 19:43, Catalin Marinas wrote:
When a slot is added by the VMM, if it asked for MTE in guest (I guess
that's an opt-in by the VMM, haven't checked the other patches), can we
reject it if it's is going to be mapped as Normal Cacheable but it is a
ZONE_DEVICE (i.e. !kvm_is_device_pfn() + one of David's suggestions to
check for ZONE_DEVICE)? This way we don't need to do more expensive
checks in set_pte_at().
The problem is that KVM allows the VMM to change the memory backing a slot
while the guest is running. This is obviously useful for the likes of
migration, but ultimately means that even if you were to do checks at the
time of slot creation, you would need to repeat the checks at set_pte_at()
time to ensure a mischievous VMM didn't swap the page for a problematic one.
Does changing the slot require some KVM API call? Can we intercept it
and do the checks there?
As David has already replied - KVM uses MMU notifiers, so there's not really
a good place to intercept this before the fault.
Maybe a better alternative for the time being is to add a new
kvm_is_zone_device_pfn() and force KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE if it returns
true _and_ the VMM asked for MTE in guest. We can then only set
PG_mte_tagged if !device.
KVM already has a kvm_is_device_pfn(), and yes I agree restricting the MTE
checks to only !kvm_is_device_pfn() makes sense (I have the fix in my branch
locally).
Indeed, you can skip it if kvm_is_device_pfn(). In addition, with MTE,
I'd also mark a pfn as 'device' in user_mem_abort() if
pfn_to_online_page() is NULL as we don't want to map it as Cacheable in
Stage 2. It's unlikely that we'll trip over this path but just in case.
(can we have a ZONE_DEVICE _online_ pfn or by definition they are
considered offline?)