qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/1] linux-user/s390x: Apply h2g to address of sigreturn stub


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] linux-user/s390x: Apply h2g to address of sigreturn stub
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:17:18 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

On 24.03.21 09:51, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
The sigreturn SVC is put onto the stack by the emulation code.  Hence
the address of it should not be subject to guest_base transformation
when fetching it.

The fix applies h2g to the address when writing it into the return
address register to nullify the transformation applied to it later.

Note: This only caused problems if Qemu has been built with
--disable-pie (as it is in distros nowadays). Otherwise guest_base
defaults to 0 hiding the actual problem.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
---
  linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c
index ecfa2a14a9..1412376958 100644
--- a/linux-user/s390x/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/s390x/signal.c
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ void setup_frame(int sig, struct target_sigaction *ka,
          env->regs[14] = (unsigned long)
                  ka->sa_restorer | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
      } else {
-        env->regs[14] = (frame_addr + offsetof(sigframe, retcode))
+        env->regs[14] = h2g(frame_addr + offsetof(sigframe, retcode))
                          | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
          __put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | TARGET_NR_sigreturn,
                     (uint16_t *)(frame->retcode));
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct target_sigaction *ka,
      if (ka->sa_flags & TARGET_SA_RESTORER) {
          env->regs[14] = (unsigned long) ka->sa_restorer | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
      } else {
-        env->regs[14] = (unsigned long) frame->retcode | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
+        env->regs[14] = (unsigned long) h2g(frame->retcode) | PSW_ADDR_AMODE;
          __put_user(S390_SYSCALL_OPCODE | TARGET_NR_rt_sigreturn,
                     (uint16_t *)(frame->retcode));
      }


Sounds sane to me, although I am not an expert on that code :)

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]