qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console: remove Armbian 1


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console: remove Armbian 19.11.3 bionic test for orangepi-pc machine
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:47:00 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

On 3/22/21 6:18 PM, Willian Rampazzo wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:54 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Willian,
>>
>> On 3/8/21 9:44 PM, Willian Rampazzo wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:41 PM Willian Rampazzo <wrampazz@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:32 PM Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Philippe, Willian,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:52 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/5/21 4:16 PM, Willian Rampazzo wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 5:44 PM Niek Linnenbank 
>>>>>>> <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The image for Armbian 19.11.3 bionic has been removed from the armbian 
>>>>>>>> server.
>>>>>>>> Without the image as input the test arm_orangepi_bionic_19_11 cannot 
>>>>>>>> run.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This commit removes the test completely and merges the code of the 
>>>>>>>> generic function
>>>>>>>> do_test_arm_orangepi_uboot_armbian back with the 20.08 test.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>  tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 72 ++++++++------------------
>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py 
>>>>>>>> b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>>>>>>> index eb01286799..9fadea9958 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>>>>>>> +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>>>>>>> @@ -802,7 +802,29 @@ def test_arm_orangepi_sd(self):
>>>>>>>>          # Wait for VM to shut down gracefully
>>>>>>>>          self.vm.wait()
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -    def do_test_arm_orangepi_uboot_armbian(self, image_path):
>>>>>>>> +    @skipUnless(os.getenv('ARMBIAN_ARTIFACTS_CACHED'),
>>>>>>>> +                'Test artifacts fetched from unreliable 
>>>>>>>> apt.armbian.com')
>>>>>>>> +    @skipUnless(os.getenv('AVOCADO_ALLOW_LARGE_STORAGE'), 'storage 
>>>>>>>> limited')
>>>>>>>> +    def test_arm_orangepi_bionic_20_08(self):
>>>>>>>> +        """
>>>>>>>> +        :avocado: tags=arch:arm
>>>>>>>> +        :avocado: tags=machine:orangepi-pc
>>>>>>>> +        :avocado: tags=device:sd
>>>>>>>> +        """
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +        # This test download a 275 MiB compressed image and expand it
>>>>>>>> +        # to 1036 MiB, but the underlying filesystem is 1552 MiB...
>>>>>>>> +        # As we expand it to 2 GiB we are safe.
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +        image_url = ('https://dl.armbian.com/orangepipc/archive/'
>>>>>>>> +                     
>>>>>>>> 'Armbian_20.08.1_Orangepipc_bionic_current_5.8.5.img.xz')
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Armbian 20 is not available on this link anymore. I can browse just 
>>>>>>> 21.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat-and-mouse game *sigh*.
>>
>> 2021-03-22 17:18:10,701 download         L0067 INFO | Fetching
>> https://archive.armbian.com/orangepipc/archive/Armbian_20.08.1_Orangepipc_bionic_current_5.8.5.img.xz
>> -> /home/phil/avocado/da
>> ta/cache/by_location/f2eb27a12b81ce15e93f340fabbced2136af1caa/Armbian_20.08.1_Orangepipc_bionic_current_5.8.5.img.xz.nfwdzivg
>> 2021-03-22 17:18:11,263 asset            L0136 INFO | Temporary asset
>> file unavailable due to failed download attempt.
>> 2021-03-22 17:18:11,263 asset            L0368 ERROR| URLError: <urlopen
>> error [Errno 113] No route to host>
>>
>> It might be a temporary problem, but looking long term the
>> current setup doesn't scale IMHO.
>>
> 
> Have you changed something in the test? The test is supposed to skip
> when the asset is not available in the cache. What was the result of
> this test execution? Skip, fail, or error? If it was not Skip, we need
> to investigate what happened.

No change, on commit b1847509268.

The result was all good but 1 "Cancelled" so I looked at the job.log.

All good IMO.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]