[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:07:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 09:33:43AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 09:30:41PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > On 18/03/21 20:46, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > > The QEMU Project has 50,000 minutes of GitLab CI quota. Let's enable
>> > > GitLab Merge Requests so that anyone can submit a merge request and get
>> > > CI coverage.
>> >
>> > Each merge request consumes about 2500. That won't last long.
>>
>> Yikes, that is 41 hours per CI run. I wonder if GitLab's CI minutes are
>> on slow machines or if we'll hit the same issue with dedicated runners.
>> It seems like CI optimization will be necessary...
>>
>
> We need to reduce the amount of CI we do, not only because we can't afford
> it, but because it's wasteful. I hate to think of all the kWhs spent
> testing the exact same code in the exact same way, since everyone runs
> everything with a simple 'git push'.
I normally refrain from posting +1s, but I feel this message really
needs "plussing": right you are! This kind of wastefulness has bothered
me a lot.
[...]
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, (continued)
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/03/30
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Paolo Bonzini, 2021/03/30
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Peter Maydell, 2021/03/30
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/03/30
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/03/30
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2021/03/30
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2021/03/30
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI,
Markus Armbruster <=
- Re: Serious doubts about Gitlab CI, Thomas Huth, 2021/03/19