[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] qga: return a more explicit error on why a command is dis
|
From: |
Peter Krempa |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] qga: return a more explicit error on why a command is disabled |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:43:12 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21) |
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:28:14 +0400, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>
> qmp_disable_command() now takes an optional error string to return a
> more explicit error message.
>
> Fixes:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928806
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - back to passing an error string, but appended to the error message.
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v3] qga: return a more explicit error on why a command is disabled,
Peter Krempa <=