qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/3] tests/acceptance: Handle tests with "cpu" tag


From: Cleber Rosa
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tests/acceptance: Handle tests with "cpu" tag
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 13:52:37 -0500

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:26:51PM -0300, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:
> Currently the acceptance tests tagged with "machine" have the "-M TYPE"
> automatically added to the list of arguments of the QEMUMachine object.
> In other words, that option is passed to the launched QEMU. On this
> series it is implemented the same feature but instead for tests marked
> with "cpu".
>

Good!

> There is a caveat, however, in case the test needs additional arguments to
> the CPU type they cannot be passed via tag, because the tags parser split
> values by comma. For example, in tests/acceptance/x86_cpu_model_versions.py,
> there are cases where:
> 
>   * -cpu is set to 
> "Cascadelake-Server,x-force-features=on,check=off,enforce=off"
>   * if it was tagged like 
> "cpu:Cascadelake-Server,x-force-features=on,check=off,enforce=off"
>     then the parser would break it into 4 tags ("cpu:Cascadelake-Server",
>     "x-force-features=on", "check=off", "enforce=off")
>   * resulting on "-cpu Cascadelake-Server" and the remaining arguments are 
> ignored.
> 
> For the example above, one should tag it (or not at all) as 
> "cpu:Cascadelake-Server"
> AND self.vm.add_args('-cpu', 
> "Cascadelake-Server,x-force-features=on,check=off,enforce=off"),
> and that results on something like:
> 
>   "qemu-system-x86_64 (...) -cpu Cascadelake-Server -cpu 
> Cascadelake-Server,x-force-features=on,check=off,enforce=off".
>

There are clearly two problems here:

1) the tag is meant to be succinct, so that it can be used by users
   selecting which tests to run.  At the same time, it's a waste
   to throw away the other information or keep it duplicate or
   incosistent.

2) QEMUMachine doesn't keep track of command line arguments
   (add_args() makes it pretty clear what's doing).  But, on this type
   of use case, a "set_args()" is desirable, in which case it would
   overwrite the existing arguments for a given command line option.

> QEMU is going to ignore the first -cpu argument. See the patch 0003 for a 
> reference.
>

But this would still be creating a QEMU command line with multiple
'-cpu' arguments, right?  I understand this could be useful for
testing the behavior of the parameter parsing (if that's intended) but
it's bad practice to be generating incorrect command line in tests.

Maybe just by tackling issue #2 this could be avoided.

Cheers,
- Cleber.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]