[PATCH] hw/ppc: e500: Add missing #address-cells and #size-cells in the eTSEC node

[Bin Meng]

From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>

Per devicetree spec v0.3 [1] chapter 2.3.5:

The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not inherited
from ancestors in the devicetree. They shall be explicitly defined.
If missing, a client program should assume a default value of 2
for #address-cells, and a value of 1 for #size-cells.

These properties are currently missing, causing the <reg> property
to be incorrectly parsed using the default values.

[1] 
https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/releases/download/v0.3/devicetree-specification-v0.3.pdf

Fixes: fdfb7f2cdb2d ("e500: Add support for eTSEC in device tree")
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
---

 hw/ppc/e500.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/e500.c b/hw/ppc/e500.c
index 01517a6..c84a021 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/e500.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/e500.c
@@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ static int create_devtree_etsec(SysBusDevice *sbdev, 
PlatformDevtreeData *data)
     qemu_fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "model", "eTSEC");
     qemu_fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "local-mac-address", etsec->conf.macaddr.a, 6);
     qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, node, "fixed-link", 0, 1, 1000, 0, 0);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, node, "#size-cells", 1);
+    qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, node, "#address-cells", 1);
 
     qemu_fdt_add_subnode(fdt, group);
     qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(fdt, group, "reg", mmio0, 0x1000);
-- 
2.7.4