qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 09/19] libqos/qgraph: add qos_node_create_driver_named()


From: Christian Schoenebeck
Subject: Re: [PULL 09/19] libqos/qgraph: add qos_node_create_driver_named()
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:10:49 +0100

On Montag, 15. Februar 2021 15:06:41 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Montag, 15. Februar 2021 14:16:16 CET Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > From: qemu_oss--- via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
> > 
> > So far the qos subsystem of the qtest framework had the limitation
> > that only one instance of the same official QEMU (QMP) driver name
> > could be created for qtests. That's because a) the created qos
> > node names must always be unique, b) the node name must match the
> > official QEMU driver name being instantiated and c) all nodes are
> > in a global space shared by all tests.
> > 
> > This patch removes this limitation by introducing a new function
> > qos_node_create_driver_named() which allows test case authors to
> > specify a node name being different from the actual associated
> > QEMU driver name. It fills the new 'qemu_name' field of
> > QOSGraphNode for that purpose.
> > 
> > Adjust build_driver_cmd_line() and qos_graph_node_set_availability()
> > to correctly deal with either accessing node name vs. node's
> > qemu_name correctly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
> > Message-Id:
> > <3be962ff38f3396f8040deaa5ffdab525c4e0b16.1611704181.git.qemu_oss@crudebyt
> > e
> > .com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> Just a side note: The odd "From:" line was because of a temporary issue with
> the mailman version running GNU lists, which caused mailman to rewrite
> certain sender addresses. The problem with mailman had been fixed in the
> meantime.
> 
> I personally don't care about it, but just that you know that this did not
> happen by purpose or something.

Paolo, do you want me to resend these patches as v2 for fixing the author 
rewrite issue?

Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]