qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RFC PATCH 10/15] sd: emmc: Update CID structure for eMMC


From: Sai Pavan Boddu
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 10/15] sd: emmc: Update CID structure for eMMC
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 10:51:12 +0000

Hi Alistair
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2021 3:41 AM
> To: Sai Pavan Boddu <saipava@xilinx.com>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>; Kevin Wolf
> <kwolf@redhat.com>; Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>; Vladimir Sementsov-
> Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>; Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>;
> Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>; Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>; Vincent
> Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>; Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> <dgilbert@redhat.com>; Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>; Stefan Hajnoczi
> <stefanha@redhat.com>; Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>; Alistair
> Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>; Edgar Iglesias <edgari@xilinx.com>; Luc
> Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>; Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>;
> Sai Pavan Boddu <saipava@xilinx.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers
> <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/15] sd: emmc: Update CID structure for eMMC
> 
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:30 AM Sai Pavan Boddu
> <sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com> wrote:
> >
> > CID structure is little different for eMMC, w.r.t to product name and
> > manufacturing date.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/sd/sd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> > index 7aab647..45311fa 100644
> > --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> > +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> > @@ -345,23 +345,41 @@ static void sd_set_scr(SDState *sd)
> >
> >  static void sd_set_cid(SDState *sd)
> >  {
> > -    sd->cid[0] = MID;          /* Fake card manufacturer ID (MID) */
> > -    sd->cid[1] = OID[0];       /* OEM/Application ID (OID) */
> > -    sd->cid[2] = OID[1];
> > -    sd->cid[3] = PNM[0];       /* Fake product name (PNM) */
> > -    sd->cid[4] = PNM[1];
> > -    sd->cid[5] = PNM[2];
> > -    sd->cid[6] = PNM[3];
> > -    sd->cid[7] = PNM[4];
> > -    sd->cid[8] = PRV;          /* Fake product revision (PRV) */
> > -    sd->cid[9] = 0xde;         /* Fake serial number (PSN) */
> > -    sd->cid[10] = 0xad;
> > -    sd->cid[11] = 0xbe;
> > -    sd->cid[12] = 0xef;
> > -    sd->cid[13] = 0x00 |       /* Manufacture date (MDT) */
> > -        ((MDT_YR - 2000) / 10);
> > -    sd->cid[14] = ((MDT_YR % 10) << 4) | MDT_MON;
> > -    sd->cid[15] = (sd_crc7(sd->cid, 15) << 1) | 1;
> > +    if (sd->emmc) {
> > +        sd->cid[0] = MID;
> > +        sd->cid[1] = 0x1;       /* CBX */
> > +        sd->cid[2] = OID[0];    /* OEM/Application ID (OID) */
> > +        sd->cid[3] = PNM[0];    /* Fake product name (PNM) 48bit */
> > +        sd->cid[4] = PNM[1];
> > +        sd->cid[5] = PNM[2];
> > +        sd->cid[6] = PNM[3];
> > +        sd->cid[7] = PNM[4];
> 
> Aren't the majority of these the same between the two cases? It's probably
> cleaner to split them out then.
[Sai Pavan Boddu] Yes, I would try to re-order. If I see only the PNM fields 
are same, rest all fields kind of moved a byte below.

Regards,
Sai Pavan
> 
> Alistair
> 
> > +        sd->cid[8] = 0x0;
> > +        sd->cid[9] = PRV;        /* Fake product revision (PRV) */
> > +        sd->cid[10] = 0xde;      /* Fake serial number (PSN) */
> > +        sd->cid[11] = 0xad;
> > +        sd->cid[12] = 0xbe;
> > +        sd->cid[13] = 0xef;
> > +        sd->cid[14] = ((MDT_YR - 1997) % 0x10); /* MDT */
> > +    } else {
> > +        sd->cid[0] = MID;       /* Fake card manufacturer ID (MID) */
> > +        sd->cid[1] = OID[0];    /* OEM/Application ID (OID) */
> > +        sd->cid[2] = OID[1];
> > +        sd->cid[3] = PNM[0];    /* Fake product name (PNM) 40bit */
> > +        sd->cid[4] = PNM[1];
> > +        sd->cid[5] = PNM[2];
> > +        sd->cid[6] = PNM[3];
> > +        sd->cid[7] = PNM[4];
> > +        sd->cid[8] = PRV;       /* Fake product revision (PRV) */
> > +        sd->cid[9] = 0xde;      /* Fake serial number (PSN) */
> > +        sd->cid[10] = 0xad;
> > +        sd->cid[11] = 0xbe;
> > +        sd->cid[12] = 0xef;
> > +        sd->cid[13] = 0x00 |    /* Manufacture date (MDT) */
> > +            ((MDT_YR - 2000) / 10);
> > +        sd->cid[14] = ((MDT_YR % 10) << 4) | MDT_MON;
> > +   }
> > +   sd->cid[15] = (sd_crc7(sd->cid, 15) << 1) | 1;
> >  }
> >
> >  #define HWBLOCK_SHIFT  9                       /* 512 bytes */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> >

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]