qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 07/22] tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py: evaluate strin


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/22] tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py: evaluate string not length
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 11:25:43 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

On 04.02.21 14:23, Alex Bennée wrote:

Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com> writes:

If the vmlinuz variable is set to anything that evaluates to True,
then the respective arguments should be set.  If the variable contains
an empty string, than it will evaluate to False, and the extra
arguments will not be set.

This keeps the same logic, but improves readability a bit.

Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
---
  tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py 
b/tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py
index f1b49f03bb..f25a386a19 100644
--- a/tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py
+++ b/tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ class VirtiofsSubmountsTest(BootLinux):
super(VirtiofsSubmountsTest, self).setUp(pubkey) - if len(vmlinuz) > 0:
+        if vmlinuz:
              self.vm.add_args('-kernel', vmlinuz,
                               '-append', 'console=ttyS0 root=/dev/sda1')

And this is were I gave up because I can't see how to run the test:

   ./tests/venv/bin/avocado run ./tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py
   JOB ID     : b3d9bfcfcd603189a471bec7d770fca3b50a81ee
   JOB LOG    : 
/home/alex/avocado/job-results/job-2021-02-04T13.21-b3d9bfc/job.log
    (1/5) 
./tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py:VirtiofsSubmountsTest.test_pre_virtiofsd_set_up:
 CANCEL: vmlinuz parameter not set; you must point it to a Linux kernel binary 
to test (to run this test with the on-image kernel, set it to an empty string) 
(0.00 s)
    (2/5) 
./tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py:VirtiofsSubmountsTest.test_pre_launch_set_up:
 CANCEL: vmlinuz parameter not set; you must point it to a Linux kernel binary 
to test (to run this test with the on-image kernel, set it to an empty string) 
(0.00 s)
    (3/5) 
./tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py:VirtiofsSubmountsTest.test_post_launch_set_up:
 CANCEL: vmlinuz parameter not set; you must point it to a Linux kernel binary
   to test (to run this test with the on-image kernel, set it to an empty 
string) (0.00 s)
    (4/5) 
./tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py:VirtiofsSubmountsTest.test_post_mount_set_up:
 CANCEL: vmlinuz parameter not set; you must point it to a Linux kernel binary 
to test (to run this test with the on-image kernel, set it to an empty string) 
(0.00 s)
    (5/5) 
./tests/acceptance/virtiofs_submounts.py:VirtiofsSubmountsTest.test_two_runs: 
CANCEL: vmlinuz parameter not set; you must point it to a Linux kernel binary 
to test (to run this test with the on-image kernel, set it to an empty string) 
(0.00 s)
   RESULTS    : PASS 0 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | 
CANCEL 5
   JOB TIME   : 0.56 s

Given the test seems to make assumptions about an environment being
setup for it I think we need some documentation somewhere about what
those pre-requisites are.

I find the cancel message pretty clear, but then again it was me who wrote it...

Either you point the vmlinuz parameter to some Linux kernel you built yourself, or you set it to the empty string to just use the kernel that’s part of the image. Setting Avocado parameters is done via -p, i.e. “-p key=value”. So in this case
“-p vmlinuz=/path/to/linux/build/arch/x86/boot/bzImage”, or
“-p vmlinuz=''”.

Ideally, vmlinuz='' would be the default, but there’s a problem with that: I submitted this test along with the patches that added the required feature to the Linux kernel, so at that point that feature was not part of Linux. That’s why you generally have to point it to a Linux kernel binary you built yourself that has this feature (5.10 does).

Using vmlinuz='' you can test it with the kernel that is part of the cloud image. Once that kernel is sufficiently new (i.e., >=5.10), we can make that the default.

Max




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]