[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async
From: |
Max Reitz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:34:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 |
On 20.01.21 14:50, Max Reitz wrote:
On 20.01.21 11:39, Max Reitz wrote:
On 19.01.21 20:22, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
19.01.2021 21:40, Max Reitz wrote:
On 16.01.21 22:46, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Hi Max!
I applied my series onto yours 129-fixing and found, that 129 fails
for backup.
And setting small max-chunk and even max-workers to 1 doesn't help!
(setting
speed like in v3 still helps).
And I found, that the problem is that really, the whole backup job
goes during
drain, because in new architecture we do just job_yield() during
the whole
background block-copy.
This leads to modifying the existing patch in the series, which
does job_enter()
from job_user_pause: we just need call job_enter() from job_pause()
to cover
not only user pauses but also drained_begin.
So, now I don't need any additional fixing of 129.
Changes in v4:
- add a lot of Max's r-b's, thanks!
03: fix over-80 line (in comment), add r-b
09: was "[PATCH v3 10/25] job: call job_enter from job_user_pause",
now changed to finally fix 129 iotest, drop r-b
10: squash-in additional wording on max-chunk, fix error message,
keep r-b
17: drop extra include, assert job_is_cancelled() instead of check,
add r-b
18: adjust commit message, add r-b
23: add comments and assertion, about the fact that test doesn't
support
paths with colon inside
fix s/disable-copy-range/use-copy-range/
Hmmm, for me, 129 sometimes fails still, because it completes too
quickly... (The error then is that 'return[0]' does not exist in
query-block-jobs’s result, because the job is already gone.)
When I insert a print(result) after the query-block-jobs, I can see
that the job has always progressed really far, even if its still
running. (Like, generally the offset is just one MB shy of 1G.)
I suspect the problem is that block-copy just copies too much from
the start (by default); i.e., it starts 64 workers with, hm, well, 1
MB of chunk size? Shouldn’t fill the 128 MB immediately...
Anyway, limiting the number of workers (to 1) and the chunk size (to
64k) with x-perf does ensure that the backup job’s progress is
limited to 1 MB or so, which looks fine to me.
I suppose we should do that, then (in 129), before patch 17?
Yes, that sounds reasonable
(PS: I can also see a MacOS failure in iotest 256. I suspect it’s
related to this series, because 256 is a backup test (with
iothreads), but I’m not sure yet. The log is here:
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5276331753603072
)
qemu received signal 31 ?
googling for MacOS...
31 SIGUSR2 terminate process User defined signal 2
coroutine-sigaltstack uses SIGUSR2 to set up new coroutines. Perhaps
it’s unrelated to backup? Guess I’ll just run the test one more time.
O:)
I ran it again, got the same error. There is no error on master, or
before backup uses block_copy.
I’m trying to run a test directly on the “move to block-copy” commit,
but so far Cirrus doesn’t seem to want me to do another test run right now.
(Though I’m pretty sure if there is no error before the block-copy
commit, then using block-copy must be the problem. The remaining
patches in my block branch are just disabling copy_range, some clean-up,
the simplebench patches, the locking code error reporting change, and a
new iotest.)
I was able to reproduce the signal on Linux, by passing
--with-coroutine=sigaltstack to configure (sometimes takes like 10 runs
to fail, though). “move to block-copy” is indeed the first failing commiit.
Letting qemu_coroutine_new() set up an aborting signal handler for
SIGUSR2 instead of restoring the default action (i.e. exiting without
core dump) yields this back trace:
Thread 1:
#0 0x00007f61870ba9d5 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007f61870a38a4 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x0000562cd2be7350 in sigusr2_handler (s=<optimized out>) at
../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:151
#3 0x00007f6187cee1e0 in <signal handler called> () at
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
#4 0x00007f61870bad8a in sigsuspend () at /lib64/libc.so.6
#5 0x0000562cd30d9e48 in qemu_coroutine_new () at
../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:220
#6 0x0000562cd3106206 in qemu_coroutine_create
(entry=entry@entry=0x562cd303c950 <block_copy_async_co_entry>,
opaque=opaque@entry=0x7f6170002c00)
at ../util/qemu-coroutine.c:75
#7 0x0000562cd303cd0e in block_copy_async
(s=0x562cd4f94400, offset=offset@entry=0, bytes=67108864,
max_workers=64, max_chunk=0, cb=cb@entry=0x562cd301dfe0
<backup_block_copy_callback>, cb_opaque=0x562cd6256940) at
../block/block-copy.c:752
#8 0x0000562cd301dd4e in backup_loop (job=<optimized out>) at
../block/backup.c:156
#9 backup_run (job=0x562cd6256940, errp=<optimized out>) at
../block/backup.c:299
#10 0x0000562cd2fc84d2 in job_co_entry (opaque=0x562cd6256940) at
../job.c:911
#11 0x0000562cd30da04b in coroutine_bootstrap
(self=self@entry=0x562cd6262ef0, co=co@entry=0x562cd6262ef0)
at ../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:105
#12 0x0000562cd30da0e1 in coroutine_trampoline (signal=<optimized out>)
at ../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:146
#13 0x00007f6187cee1e0 in <signal handler called> () at
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
#14 0x00007f61870bad8a in sigsuspend () at /lib64/libc.so.6
Thread 2:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f6187cee2b6 in __libc_sigaction () at /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1 0x0000562cd30d9dc7 in qemu_coroutine_new () at
../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:194
#2 0x0000562cd3106206 in qemu_coroutine_create
(entry=entry@entry=0x562cd3016c20 <aio_task_co>,
opaque=opaque@entry=0x7f616c0063d0)
at ../util/qemu-coroutine.c:75
#3 0x0000562cd3016dd4 in aio_task_pool_start_task (pool=0x7f616c0067d0,
task=0x7f616c0063d0)
at ../block/aio_task.c:94
#4 0x0000562cd303c193 in block_copy_task_run (task=<optimized out>,
pool=<optimized out>)
at ../block/block-copy.c:330
#5 block_copy_dirty_clusters (call_state=0x7f616c002c00) at
../block/block-copy.c:646
#6 block_copy_common (call_state=0x7f616c002c00) at
../block/block-copy.c:696
#7 0x0000562cd30da04b in coroutine_bootstrap
(self=self@entry=0x7f616c003660, co=co@entry=0x7f616c003660)
at ../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:105
#8 0x0000562cd30da0e1 in coroutine_trampoline (signal=<optimized out>)
at ../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:146
#9 0x00007f6187cee1e0 in <signal handler called> () at
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
#10 0x00007f61870bad8a in sigsuspend () at /lib64/libc.so.6
#11 0x0000562cd30d9f61 in qemu_coroutine_new () at
../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:254
#12 0x0000562cd61b40d0 in ()
#13 0x00007f6163fff930 in ()
#14 0x00007f6187cecc5f in annobin_pt_longjmp.c_end () at
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
#15 0x0000562cd30da00d in qemu_coroutine_switch
(from_=0x562cd5cc3400, to_=0x7f616c003108,
action=action@entry=COROUTINE_YIELD)
at ../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:284
#16 0x0000562cd31065f0 in qemu_coroutine_yield () at
../util/qemu-coroutine.c:193
#17 0x0000562cd2fc751d in job_do_yield (job=0x562cd5cc3400,
ns=18446744073709551615) at ../job.c:478
#18 0x0000562cd2fc855f in job_yield (job=0x562cd5cc3400) at ../job.c:525
#19 0x0000562cd301dd74 in backup_loop (job=<optimized out>) at
../block/backup.c:164
#20 backup_run (job=0x562cd5cc3400, errp=<optimized out>) at
../block/backup.c:299
#21 0x0000562cd2fc84d2 in job_co_entry (opaque=0x562cd5cc3400) at
../job.c:911
#22 0x0000562cd30da04b in coroutine_bootstrap
(self=self@entry=0x562cd61b40d0, co=co@entry=0x562cd61b40d0)
at ../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:105
#23 0x0000562cd30da0e1 in coroutine_trampoline (signal=<optimized out>)
at ../util/coroutine-sigaltstack.c:146
#24 0x00007f6187cee1e0 in <signal handler called> () at
/lib64/libpthread.so.0
#25 0x00007f61870bad8a in sigsuspend () at /lib64/libc.so.6
#26 0x0000000000000001 in ()
#27 0x0000000000000000 in ()
From a glance, it looks to me like two coroutines are created
simultaneously in two threads, and so one thread sets up a special
SIGUSR2 action, then another reverts SIGUSR2 to the default, and then
the first one kills itself with SIGUSR2.
Not sure what this has to do with backup, though it is interesting that
backup_loop() runs in two threads. So perhaps some AioContext problem.
Max
- [PATCH v4 22/23] simplebench: bench_block_job: add cmd_options argument, (continued)
- [PATCH v4 22/23] simplebench: bench_block_job: add cmd_options argument, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2021/01/16
- [PATCH v4 17/23] backup: move to block-copy, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2021/01/16
- [PATCH v4 14/23] iotests: 257: prepare for backup over block-copy, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2021/01/16
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/19
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2021/01/19
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2021/01/19
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async,
Max Reitz <=
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] backup performance: block_status + async, Max Reitz, 2021/01/20
[PATCH v4 11.5/23] iotests/129: Limit backup's max-chunk/max-workers, Max Reitz, 2021/01/20