Re: [PATCH 6/7] block/rbd: add write zeroes support

[Jason Dillaman]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 2:41 PM Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
>
> Am 14.01.21 um 20:19 schrieb Jason Dillaman:
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 11:42 AM Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
> >> ---
> >>  block/rbd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c
> >> index 2d77d0007f..27b4404adf 100644
> >> --- a/block/rbd.c
> >> +++ b/block/rbd.c
> >> @@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ typedef enum {
> >>      RBD_AIO_READ,
> >>      RBD_AIO_WRITE,
> >>      RBD_AIO_DISCARD,
> >> -    RBD_AIO_FLUSH
> >> +    RBD_AIO_FLUSH,
> >> +    RBD_AIO_WRITE_ZEROES
> >>  } RBDAIOCmd;
> >>
> >>  typedef struct BDRVRBDState {
> >> @@ -221,8 +222,12 @@ done:
> >>
> >>  static void qemu_rbd_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
> >>  {
> >> +    BDRVRBDState *s = bs->opaque;
> >>      /* XXX Does RBD support AIO on less than 512-byte alignment? */
> >>      bs->bl.request_alignment = 512;
> >> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
> >> +    bs->bl.pwrite_zeroes_alignment = s->object_size;
> > The optimal alignment is 512 bytes -- but it can safely work just fine
> > down to 1 byte alignment since it will pad the request with additional
> > writes if needed.
>
>
> Okay and this will likely be faster than having Qemu doing that request 
> split, right?
>
> If we drop the alignment hint Qemu will pass the original request.
>
>
> >
> >> +#endif
> >>  }
> >>
> >>
> >> @@ -695,6 +700,9 @@ static int qemu_rbd_open(BlockDriverState *bs, QDict 
> >> *options, int flags,
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      s->aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
> >> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
> >> +    bs->supported_zero_flags = BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP;
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >>      /* When extending regular files, we get zeros from the OS */
> >>      bs->supported_truncate_flags = BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE;
> >> @@ -808,6 +816,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
> >> qemu_rbd_start_co(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >>      case RBD_AIO_FLUSH:
> >>          r = rbd_aio_flush(s->image, c);
> >>          break;
> >> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
> >> +    case RBD_AIO_WRITE_ZEROES:
> >> +        r = rbd_aio_write_zeroes(s->image, offset, bytes, c, 0, 0);
> >> +        break;
> >> +#endif
> >>      default:
> >>          r = -EINVAL;
> >>      }
> >> @@ -880,6 +893,19 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
> >> qemu_rbd_co_pdiscard(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >>      return qemu_rbd_start_co(bs, offset, count, NULL, 0, RBD_AIO_DISCARD);
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +#ifdef LIBRBD_SUPPORTS_WRITE_ZEROES
> >> +static int
> >> +coroutine_fn qemu_rbd_co_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
> >> offset,
> >> +                                      int count, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
> >> +{
> >> +    if (!(flags & BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP)) {
> >> +        return -ENOTSUP;
> >> +    }
> > There is a "RBD_WRITE_ZEROES_FLAG_THICK_PROVISION" flag that you can
> > use to optionally disable unmap.
>
>
> I have seen that. If you want I can support for this, too. But afaik this
>
> is only available since Octopus release?

True -- I didn't backport that support to Nautilus since it was a new
feature vs the bug-fix that the write-zeroes API was introduced to
fix.

>
> Peter
>
>


-- 
Jason