[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Remove virt machine state 'smp_cpus'
From: |
David Edmondson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/virt: Remove virt machine state 'smp_cpus' |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 08:38:02 +0000 |
On Wednesday, 2020-12-16 at 07:43:53 +01, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:20:48PM +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 2020-12-15 at 18:48:15 +01, Andrew Jones wrote:
>>
>> > static void fdt_add_cpu_nodes(const VirtMachineState *vms)
>> > {
>> > - int cpu;
>> > - int addr_cells = 1;
>> > const MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms);
>> > + int smp_cpus = ms->smp.cpus, cpu;
>>
>> Is it house-style to have initialised and un-initialised local variables
>> declared on the same line?
>>
>
> checkpatch.pl doesn't complain and a grep of qemu shows hundreds of other
> examples. That said, I only see one other example in hw/arm/virt.c, so if
> we'd rather avoid it, I'll repost.
Not at all, I was just curious.
dme.
--
Driving at 90 down those country lanes, singing to "Tiny Dancer".