[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1
From: |
Leif Lindholm |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:49:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 13:23:58 +0100, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:51 PM Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
> > ---
> > target/arm/cpu.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> > index fadd1a47df..90ba707b64 100644
> > --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> > @@ -1736,6 +1736,30 @@ FIELD(V7M_FPCCR, ASPEN, 31, 1)
> > /*
> > * System register ID fields.
> > */
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, CTYPE1, 0, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, CTYPE2, 3, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, CTYPE3, 6, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, CTYPE4, 9, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, CTYPE5, 12, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, CTYPE6, 15, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, CTYPE7, 18, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, LOUIS, 21, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, LOC, 24, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, LOUU, 27, 3)
> > +FIELD(CLIDR_EL1, ICB, 30, 3)
> > +
> > +FIELD(CCSIDR_EL1, LINESIZE, 0, 3)
> > +FIELD(CCSIDR_EL1, ASSOCIATIVITY, 3, 21)
> > +FIELD(CCSIDR_EL1, NUMSETS, 32, 24)
>
> The positions and sizes of the ASSOCIATIVITY and NUMSETS CCSIDR fields
> depend on whether the ARMv8.3-CCIDX extension is implemented or not.
> If we really want to define the fields this way, we perhaps should
> define two sets. Or at the very least, add a comment stating this
> definition is for ARMv8.3-CCIDX.
Urgh, sorry for this.
I added the fields only to make the CPU definition more readable, so I
think we don't need to worry about runtime handling of this?
But I don't think it makes sense to add only the one form.
Should I use CCIDX_CCSIDR_EL1 for these ones and add
/* When FEAT_CCIDX is not implemented */
FIELD(CCSIDR_EL1, LINESIZE, 0, 3)
FIELD(CCSIDR_EL1, ASSOCIATIVITY, 3, 10)
FIELD(CCSIDR_EL1, NUMSETS, 13, 15)
with a comment that
/* When FEAT_CCIDX is implemented */
for the former set
?
> > +FIELD(CTR_EL0, IMINLINE, 0, 4)
> > +FIELD(CTR_EL0, L1IP, 14, 2)
> > +FIELD(CTR_EL0, DMINLINE, 16, 4)
> > +FIELD(CTR_EL0, ERG, 20, 4)
> > +FIELD(CTR_EL0, CWG, 24, 4)
> > +FIELD(CTR_EL0, IDC, 28, 1)
> > +FIELD(CTR_EL0, DIC, 29, 1)
>
> There's a missing field: TminLine which starts at bit 32.
Ack, oops.
> If
> implemented, that would require to make ctr a 64-bit integer.
As far as I can tell, this will be safe with existing code - should I
fold in a patch extending the register?
Regards,
Leif
> Thanks,
>
> Laurent
>
> > +
> > FIELD(MIDR_EL1, REVISION, 0, 4)
> > FIELD(MIDR_EL1, PARTNUM, 4, 12)
> > FIELD(MIDR_EL1, ARCHITECTURE, 16, 4)
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
> >
- [PATCH v2 0/5] target/arm: various changes to cpu.h, Leif Lindholm, 2020/12/15
- [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h, Leif Lindholm, 2020/12/15
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h, Laurent Desnogues, 2020/12/15
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h,
Leif Lindholm <=
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h, Laurent Desnogues, 2020/12/17
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h, Leif Lindholm, 2020/12/17
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h, Laurent Desnogues, 2020/12/17
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] target/arm: add descriptions of CLIDR_EL1, CCSIDR_EL1, CTR_EL0 to cpu.h, Leif Lindholm, 2020/12/17
[PATCH v2 4/5] target/arm: add aarch64 ID register fields to cpu.h, Leif Lindholm, 2020/12/15
[PATCH v2 2/5] target/arm: make ARMCPU.clidr 64-bit, Leif Lindholm, 2020/12/15
[PATCH v2 1/5] target/arm: fix typo in cpu.h ID_AA64PFR1 field name, Leif Lindholm, 2020/12/15