qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [for-6.0 v5 13/13] s390: Recognize securable-guest-memory option


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [for-6.0 v5 13/13] s390: Recognize securable-guest-memory option
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:45:26 +0100

On Fri,  4 Dec 2020 16:44:15 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> At least some s390 cpu models support "Protected Virtualization" (PV),
> a mechanism to protect guests from eavesdropping by a compromised
> hypervisor.
> 
> This is similar in function to other mechanisms like AMD's SEV and
> POWER's PEF, which are controlled bythe "securable-guest-memory" machine

s/bythe/by the/

> option.  s390 is a slightly special case, because we already supported
> PV, simply by using a CPU model with the required feature
> (S390_FEAT_UNPACK).
> 
> To integrate this with the option used by other platforms, we
> implement the following compromise:
> 
>  - When the securable-guest-memory option is set, s390 will recognize it,
>    verify that the CPU can support PV (failing if not) and set virtio
>    default options necessary for encrypted or protected guests, as on
>    other platforms.  i.e. if securable-guest-memory is set, we will
>    either create a guest capable of entering PV mode, or fail outright

s/outright/outright./

> 
>  - If securable-guest-memory is not set, guest's might still be able to

s/guest's/guests/

>    enter PV mode, if the CPU has the right model.  This may be a
>    little surprising, but shouldn't actually be harmful.
> 
> To start a guest supporting Protected Virtualization using the new
> option use the command line arguments:
>     -object s390-pv-guest,id=pv0 -machine securable-guest-memory=pv0
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/pv.c         | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/s390x/pv.h |  1 +
>  target/s390x/kvm.c    |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
> 

Modulo any naming changes etc., I think this should work for s390. I
don't have the hardware to test this, however, and would appreciate
someone with a PV setup giving this a go.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]