On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 09:51:38PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:22 PM Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 03:03:25PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > > Object property insertion code iterates over an integer to get an unused
> > > index that can be used as an unique name for an object property. This loop
> > > increments the integer value indefinitely. Although very unlikely, this can
> > > still cause an integer overflow.
> > > In this change, we fix the above code by checking against INT16_MAX and making
> > > sure that the interger index does not overflow beyond that value. If no
> > > available index is found, the code would cause an assertion failure. This
> > > assertion failure is necessary because the callers of the function do not check
> > > the return value for NULL.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> >
> > Queued on machine-next, thanks! My apologies for the delay.
>
> Any idea when this will be pulled?
I was planning to send a pull request before soft freeze,
(October 27) but this was the only patch in the queue at that
moment, so I decided to wait.
As we're beyond freeze now, the pull request will be sent
immediately after 5.2.0 is released.
Gentle reminder since 5.2.0 has now been released.