[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH-for-5.2?] target/mips/translate: Check R6 reserved encoding f
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH-for-5.2?] target/mips/translate: Check R6 reserved encoding for Load Linked Word |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:34:59 +0100 |
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 5:15 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
> On 11/24/20 4:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 11/24/20 5:45 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Release 6 recoded the 'Load Linked Word' using SPECIAL3 opcode,
> >> this opcode (0b110000) is now reserved.
> >>
> >> Ref: A.2 Instruction Bit Encoding Tables:
> >>
> >> "6Rm instructions signal a Reserved Instruction exception
> >> when executed by a Release 6 implementation."
> >>
> >> The check was added in commit 4368b29a26e ("target-mips: move
> >> LL and SC instructions") but got lost during latter refactor
> >> in commit d9224450208 ("target-mips: Tighten ISA level checks").
> >
> > I think git blame is confused here -- d9224450208 isn't the one that broke
> > things. The patch has:
> >
> >
> > + case OPC_LL: /* Load and stores */
> > + check_insn(ctx, ISA_MIPS2);
> > + /* Fallthrough */
> > + case OPC_LWL:
> > case OPC_LWR:
> > - case OPC_LL:
> > check_insn_opc_removed(ctx, ISA_MIPS32R6);
> > + /* Fallthrough */
>
> Sorry I have been confused by the /* Fallthrough */ ...
>
> The check is below.
>
> Self-NAck then.
Duh I hit that again, read the patch again, looks correct. I guess
I got confused myself reviewing the offending patch...
So I'm applying this patch to mips-next queue, using
Fixes: d9224450208 ("target-mips: Tighten ISA level checks")
Thanks,
Phil.
- Re: [PATCH-for-5.2?] target/mips/translate: Check R6 reserved encoding for Load Linked Word,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=