Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] MTE support for KVM guest

[Marc Zyngier]

On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:34:05 +0000,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 04:05:55PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > What I'd really like to see is a description of how shared memory
> > is, in general, supposed to work with MTE. My gut feeling is that
> > it doesn't, and that you need to turn MTE off when sharing memory
> > (either implicitly or explicitly).
> 
> The allocation tag (in-memory tag) is a property assigned to a physical
> address range and it can be safely shared between different processes as
> long as they access it via pointers with the same allocation tag (bits
> 59:56). The kernel enables such tagged shared memory for user processes
> (anonymous, tmpfs, shmem).

I think that's one case where the shared memory scheme breaks, as we
have two kernels in charge of their own tags, and they obviously can't
be synchronised

> What we don't have in the architecture is a memory type which allows
> access to tags but no tag checking. To access the data when the tags
> aren't known, the tag checking would have to be disabled via either a
> prctl() or by setting the PSTATE.TCO bit.

I guess that's point (3) in Steven's taxonomy. It still a bit ugly to
fit in an existing piece of userspace, specially if it wants to use
MTE for its own benefit.

> The kernel accesses the user memory via the linear map using a match-all
> tag 0xf, so no TCO bit toggling. For user, however, we disabled such
> match-all tag and it cannot be enabled at run-time (at least not easily,
> it's cached in the TLB). However, we already have two modes to disable
> tag checking which Qemu could use when migrating data+tags.

I wonder whether we will have to have something kernel side to
dump/reload tags in a way that matches the patterns used by live
migration.

        M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.