qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 09/13] u2f-passthru: put it into the 'usb' category


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] u2f-passthru: put it into the 'usb' category
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 09:52:42 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1

On 07/12/2020 09.05, ganqixin wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [mailto:philmd@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 9:50 PM
>> To: ganqixin <ganqixin@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
>> qemu-trivial@nongnu.org
>> Cc: Chenqun (kuhn) <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>; Zhanghailiang
>> <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
>> <kraxel@redhat.com>; thuth@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] u2f-passthru: put it into the 'usb' category
>>
>> On 11/17/20 2:37 PM, ganqixin wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [mailto:philmd@redhat.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 10:05 PM
>>>> To: ganqixin <ganqixin@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
>>>> qemu-trivial@nongnu.org; Marc-André Lureau
>>>> <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>; thuth@redhat.com
>>>> Cc: Chenqun (kuhn) <kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com>; Zhanghailiang
>>>> <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
>> <kraxel@redhat.com>;
>>>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] u2f-passthru: put it into the 'usb'
>>>> category
>>>>
>>>> On 11/15/20 7:48 PM, Gan Qixin wrote:
>>>>> The category of the u2f-passthru device is not set, put it into the 'usb'
>>>>> category.
>>>>
>>>> I guess we discussed this with Thomas 1 or 2 years ago but I don't
>> remember.
>>>> I think it was about using set_bits() so devices can appear in
>>>> multiple categories.
>>>>
>>>> Gerd, do you know what is the point of the "usb" category for
>>>> management apps? This is a bus accepting multiple better categorized
>>>> devices (display, storage, input, network, sound).
>>>>
>>>> Unrelated but multiple devices are related to SECURITY.
>>>> Maybe it is time to introduce the DEVICE_CATEGORY_SECURITY?
>>>
>>> Hi, Philippe
>>> Thanks for your reply, but I'm not sure if it is appropriate to add a
>> security category to place this device.
>>> (Maybe it's because I don't know much about these device, I haven't
>>> find many safety-related devices in 'misc' category or uncategorized
>>> devices)
>>
>> What is the difference between 'misc' and 'uncategorized'?
> 
> In my opinion, devices that we forgot to classify will appear in 
> "uncategorized" list, and devices that don't have a suitable category to 
> choose will be put into "misc" category.

That's right. User-creatable devices should have a category, and the
uncategorized devices just have not been categorized yet.

So thanks for tackling this, Gan Qixin!

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]