[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for a regular upstream performance testing
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal for a regular upstream performance testing |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:22:10 +0000 |
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 09:05:49AM +0100, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
> Dne 30. 11. 20 v 14:25 Stefan Hajnoczi napsal(a):
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:10:14AM +0100, Lukáš Doktor wrote:
> > What is the minimal environment needed for bare metal hosts?
> >
>
> Not sure what you mean by that. For provisioning I have a beaker plugin,
> other plugins can be added if needed. Even without beaker one can also
> provide an installed machine and skip the provisioning step. Runperf would
> then only apply the profiles (including fetching the VM images from public
> sources) and run the tests on them. Note that for certain profiles might need
> to reboot the machine and in such case the tested machine can not be the one
> running run-perf, other profiles can use the current machine but it's still
> not a very good idea as the additional overhead might spoil the results.
>
> Note that for a very simple issue which do not require a special setup I am
> usually just running a custom VM on my laptop and use a Localhost profile on
> that VM, which basically results in testing that custom-setup VM's
> performance. It's dirty but very fast for the first-level check.
I was thinking about reprovisioning the machine to ensure each run
starts from the same clean state. This requires reprovisioning.
Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
RE: Proposal for a regular upstream performance testing, Chenqun (kuhn), 2020/12/02