|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 00/18] qapi/qom: QAPIfy object-add |
Date: | Mon, 30 Nov 2020 17:32:09 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 |
On 30/11/20 16:30, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
{ 'struct': 'QCryptoSecretCommon', 'base': 'Object', 'state': { 'rawdata': '*uint8_t', 'rawlen': 'size_t' }, 'data': { '*format': 'QCryptoSecretFormat', '*keyid': 'str', '*iv': 'str' } } { 'struct': 'QCryptoSecret', 'base': 'QCryptoSecretCommon', 'data': { '*data': 'str', '*file': 'str' } }
No, please don't do this. I want to keep writing C code, not a weird JSON syntax for C.
I'd much rather have a FooOptions field in my struct so that I can just do visit_FooOptions in the UserCreatable.complete() method, that's feasible.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |