qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 19/92] hw/char/serial: Assert serial_ioport_read/write offset


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PULL 19/92] hw/char/serial: Assert serial_ioport_read/write offset fits 8 bytes
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:40:04 +0000

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 10:40, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>
> The serial device has 8 registers, each 8-bit. The MemoryRegionOps
> 'serial_io_ops' is initialized with max_access_size=1, and all
> memory_region_init_io() callers correctly set the region size to
> 8 bytes:
> - serial_io_realize
> - serial_isa_realizefn
> - serial_pci_realize
> - multi_serial_pci_realize
>
> It is safe to assert the offset argument of serial_ioport_read()
> and serial_ioport_write() is always less than 8.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> Message-Id: <20200907015535.827885-2-f4bug@amsat.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/char/serial.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/char/serial.c b/hw/char/serial.c
> index fd80ae5592..840da89de7 100644
> --- a/hw/char/serial.c
> +++ b/hw/char/serial.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void serial_ioport_write(void *opaque, hwaddr 
> addr, uint64_t val,
>  {
>      SerialState *s = opaque;
>
> -    addr &= 7;
> +    assert(size == 1 && addr < 8);
>      trace_serial_ioport_write(addr, val);
>      switch(addr) {
>      default:

Bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1904331
points out that the addition of this assert() makes obvious
that either the assert is wrong or some code later in the
function which is looking at size must be dead:
            if (size == 1) {
                s->divider = (s->divider & 0xff00) | val;
            } else {
                s->divider = val;
            }

Presumably it's the if() that should be fixed ?

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]