qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] qemu-option: clean up id vs. list->merge_lists


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] qemu-option: clean up id vs. list->merge_lists
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:59:00 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0

On 09/11/20 19:38, Markus Armbruster wrote:
They are never qemu_opts_find'd with non-NULL id, so I'd say they are.

We also need to check qemu_opts_foreach().

Using qemu_opts_foreach means that e.g. -name id=... was not ignored unlike -M id=.... However, it will be an error now. We have to check if the callback or its callees use the opt->id

Reminder of how the affected options are affected:

reopen_opts in qemu-io-cmds.c   qemu_opts_find(&reopen_opts, NULL)

empty_opts in qemu-io.c         qemu_opts_find(&empty_opts, NULL)

qemu_rtc_opts                   qemu_find_opts_singleton("rtc")

qemu_machine_opts               qemu_find_opts_singleton("machine")

qemu_boot_opts                  
        QTAILQ_FIRST(&qemu_find_opts("bootopts")->head)

qemu_name_opts                  qemu_opts_foreach->parse_name
                                parse_name does not use id

qemu_mem_opts                   qemu_find_opts_singleton("memory")

qemu_icount_opts                qemu_opts_foreach->do_configuree_icount
                                do_configure_icount->icount_configure
                                icount_configure does not use id

qemu_smp_opts
        qemu_opts_find(qemu_find_opts("smp-opts"), NULL)

qemu_spice_opts                 QTAILQ_FIRST(&qemu_spice_opts.head)

To preempt your question, I can add this in the commit message. Anyway I think it's relatively self-explanatory for most of these that they do not need "id".

- merge_lists = false: singleton opts with NULL id; non-NULL id fails

Do you mean merge_lists = true here, and ...

- merge_lists = true: always return new opts; non-NULL id fails if dup

... = false here?

Of course.  1-1 in the brain fart competition.

Paolo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]