[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] target/microblaze: Fix possible array out of bounds in mmu_w
From: |
AlexChen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] target/microblaze: Fix possible array out of bounds in mmu_write() |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:17:40 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 2020/11/6 22:16, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 11/3/20 8:46 AM, AlexChen wrote:
>> The size of env->mmu.regs is 3, but the range of 'rn' is [0, 5].
>> To avoid data access out of bounds, only if 'rn' is less than 3, we
>> can print env->mmu.regs[rn]. In other cases, we can print
>> env->mmu.regs[MMU_R_TLBX].
>>
>> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> target/microblaze/mmu.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/microblaze/mmu.c b/target/microblaze/mmu.c
>> index 1dbbb271c4..917ad6d69e 100644
>> --- a/target/microblaze/mmu.c
>> +++ b/target/microblaze/mmu.c
>> @@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ void mmu_write(CPUMBState *env, bool ext, uint32_t rn,
>> uint32_t v)
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU,
>> - "%s rn=%d=%x old=%x\n", __func__, rn, v,
>> env->mmu.regs[rn]);
>> + "%s rn=%d=%x old=%x\n", __func__, rn, v,
>> + rn < 3 ? env->mmu.regs[rn] : env->mmu.regs[MMU_R_TLBX]);
>
> Nack. If rn >= ARRAY_SIZE(env->mmu.regs), then don't displays it.
> Else it is confuse to see a value unrelated to the MMU index used...
>
Hi Philippe,
Thanks for your review.
The env->mmu.regs[MMU_R_TLBX] is used when rn >= ARRAY_SIZE(env->mmu.regs),
can we change the description of the log as follows so that it doesn't confuse
us?
---
target/microblaze/mmu.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/microblaze/mmu.c b/target/microblaze/mmu.c
index 1dbbb271c4..14863ed8d1 100644
--- a/target/microblaze/mmu.c
+++ b/target/microblaze/mmu.c
@@ -234,7 +234,9 @@ void mmu_write(CPUMBState *env, bool ext, uint32_t rn,
uint32_t v)
unsigned int i;
qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU,
- "%s rn=%d=%x old=%x\n", __func__, rn, v, env->mmu.regs[rn]);
+ "%s rn=%d=%x %s=%x\n", __func__, rn, v,
+ rn < 3 ? "old" : "regs[MMU_R_TLBX]",
+ rn < 3 ? env->mmu.regs[rn] : env->mmu.regs[MMU_R_TLBX]);
if (cpu->cfg.mmu < 2 || !cpu->cfg.mmu_tlb_access) {
qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "MMU access on MMU-less system\n");
Thanks,
Alex