[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers
|
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Nov 2020 16:36:05 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes:
> On 11/6/20 7:33 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
>> In other words "%" PRIu32 is just a less legible alias for "%u" in all
>> cases that matter.
>
> Can we add a checkpatch rule to avoid using 'PRI[dux]32' format,
> so it is clear for everyone?
I guess we could, but *I* can't: -ENOTIME, sorry.
- [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, AlexChen, 2020/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Thomas Huth, 2020/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, AlexChen, 2020/11/05
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Thomas Huth, 2020/11/05
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Markus Armbruster, 2020/11/06
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/11/06
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers,
Markus Armbruster <=
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Thomas Huth, 2020/11/08
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Markus Armbruster, 2020/11/09
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Alex Chen, 2020/11/09
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Markus Armbruster, 2020/11/09
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Thomas Huth, 2020/11/10
- Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Markus Armbruster, 2020/11/11
Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers, Markus Armbruster, 2020/11/05