[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] fw_cfg: Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg
From: |
Jiahui Cen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] fw_cfg: Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:07:24 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 2020/11/5 4:05, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> +Phil, +Gerd
>
> On 11/04/20 20:54, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> +Marcel
>>
>> On 11/03/20 13:01, Jiahui Cen wrote:
>>> From: Yubo Miao <miaoyubo@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg, therefore the uefi could
>>> get the extra roots. Only if the uefi knows there are extra roots,
>>> the config space of devices behind the root could be obtained.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yubo Miao <miaoyubo@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiahui Cen <cenjiahui@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/arm/virt.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> hw/i386/pc.c | 18 ++----------------
>>> hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h | 2 ++
>>> include/hw/pci/pcie_host.h | 4 ++++
>>> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> I realize I never reacted to this patch before (and we're at v9), so you
> might not welcome my feedback at this point.
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for your comments. Any feedback is welcomed at any time :)
> The explanation why I've only reacted now is the following: there's an
> agreement between Phil and myself that Phil handles fw_cfg reviews
> primarily, and I review only (or almost only) Phil's patches for fw_cfg.
> Furthermore, all versions of this particular patch, as far as I can see,
> CC'd me but not Phil. So Phil never knew to look, and I never checked
> (this being an fw_cfg patch, per subject line) beyond the author being
> Phil or not.
I did not know the agreement between you and Phil before, and it's
my mistake forgetting to CC Phil. I'll check the CC list in the
future patches.
Thanks
Jiahui
> The solution is of course to use the get_maintainer.pl script for
> determining reviewers, and adding them with "Cc:" tags to the commit
> message. (You also missed Marcel at the least; see my previous
> response.) git-send-email is supposed to adhere to those "Cc:" tags.
>
> The reason I've looked now is... I guess I was too tired to remember our
> agreement with Phil.
>> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
> .
>
- [PATCH v9 0/8] pci_expander_brdige:acpi: Support pxb-pcie for ARM, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 5/8] acpi: Align the size to 128k, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 3/8] acpi: Extract crs build form acpi_build.c, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 8/8] unit-test: Add the binary file and clear diff.h, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 1/8] acpi: Extract two APIs from acpi_dsdt_add_pci, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
- [PATCH v9 2/8] fw_cfg: Write the extra roots into the fw_cfg, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
[PATCH v9 6/8] unit-test: The files changed., Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
[PATCH v9 4/8] acpi: Refactor the source of host bridge and build tables for pxb, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
[PATCH v9 7/8] unit-test: Add testcase for pxb, Jiahui Cen, 2020/11/03
Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] pci_expander_brdige:acpi: Support pxb-pcie for ARM, Gerd Hoffmann, 2020/11/05