qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:44:46 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0

On 04/11/2020 11.23, AlexChen wrote:
> We should use printf format specifier "%u" instead of "%d" for
> argument of type "unsigned int".
> 
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chen <alex.chen@huawei.com>
> ---
>  tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> index d20094d5a7..bc681a95d5 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void 
> *data)
>          if (kvm_supports_sve) {
>              g_assert(vls != 0);
>              max_vq = 64 - __builtin_clzll(vls);
> -            sprintf(max_name, "sve%d", max_vq * 128);
> +            sprintf(max_name, "sve%u", max_vq * 128);
> 
>              /* Enabling a supported length is of course fine. */
>              assert_sve_vls(qts, "host", vls, "{ %s: true }", max_name);
> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void 
> *data)
>                   * unless all larger, supported vector lengths are also
>                   * disabled.
>                   */
> -                sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
> +                sprintf(name, "sve%u", vq * 128);
>                  error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name);
>                  assert_error(qts, "host", error,
>                               "{ %s: true, %s: false }",
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void 
> *data)
>               * we need at least one vector length enabled.
>               */
>              vq = __builtin_ffsll(vls);
> -            sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
> +            sprintf(name, "sve%u", vq * 128);
>              error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name);
>              assert_error(qts, "host", error, "{ %s: false }", name);
>              g_free(error);
> @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void 
> *data)
>                  }
>              }
>              if (vq <= SVE_MAX_VQ) {
> -                sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128);
> +                sprintf(name, "sve%u", vq * 128);
>                  error = g_strdup_printf("cannot enable %s", name);
>                  assert_error(qts, "host", error, "{ %s: true }", name);
>                  g_free(error);
> 

max_vq and vq are both "uint32_t" and not "unsigned int" ... so if you want
to fix this really really correctly, please use PRIu32 from inttypes.h instead.

 Thanks,
  Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]