Re: [PATCH 00/11] sockets: Attempt to drain the abstract socket swamp

[Daniel P . Berrangé]

On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:59:43AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:44:49AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:11:19AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> writes:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > Hi Markus,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 5:43 PM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> 
> >> >> > wrote:
> [...]
> >> >> >> Regardless, I *will* make time for ripping the feature out if we
> >> >> >> decide to do that.  Quick & easy way to avoid reviewing this series
> >> >> >> *hint* *hint*.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > well, fwiw, I would also take that approach too, to the risk of 
> >> >> > upsetting
> >> >> > the users.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Reverting the feature requires rough consensus and a patch.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I can provide a patch, but let's give everybody a chance to object
> >> >> first.
> >> 
> >> Daniel, do you object, yes or no?
> >
> > Yes, I object to removing the feature as it is clearly useful.
> 
> Thanks.  I sent v2 of my fixes.  Can you take care of getting them
> merged, hopefully in time for 5.2?

Sure, I'll aim to review & send PR today / tomorrow.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|