qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] hw/misc: Add npcm7xx random number generator


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] hw/misc: Add npcm7xx random number generator
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:34:41 +0000

On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 22:06, Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com> wrote:
>
> The RNG module returns a byte of randomness when the Data Valid bit is
> set.
>
> This implementation ignores the prescaler setting, and loads a new value
> into RNGD every time RNGCS is read while the RNG is enabled and random
> data is available.
>
> A qtest featuring some simple randomness tests is included.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tyrone Ting <kfting@nuvoton.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Havard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@google.com>

I've just seen some intermittent failures on the rng tests
in this patch:

PASS 1 qtest-arm/npcm7xx_rng-test /arm/npcm7xx_rng/enable_disable
PASS 2 qtest-arm/npcm7xx_rng-test /arm/npcm7xx_rng/rosel
**
ERROR:../../tests/qtest/npcm7xx_rng-test.c:190:test_continuous_monobit:
assertion failed (calc_monobit_p(buf, sizeof(buf)) > 0.01):
(0.00800994233 > 0.01)

(on OSX)

and (on x86-64 Linux):

MALLOC_PERTURB_=${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$(( ${RANDOM:-0} % 255 + 1))}
QTEST_QEMU_IMG=./qemu-img G_TEST_DBUS_DAEMON=/home/petmay01/li
naro/qemu-for-merges/tests/dbus-vmstate-daemon.sh
QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./qemu-system-arm tests/qtest/npcm7xx_rng-test --tap
-k
PASS 1 qtest-arm/npcm7xx_rng-test /arm/npcm7xx_rng/enable_disable
PASS 2 qtest-arm/npcm7xx_rng-test /arm/npcm7xx_rng/rosel
PASS 3 qtest-arm/npcm7xx_rng-test /arm/npcm7xx_rng/continuous/monobit
**
ERROR:../../tests/qtest/npcm7xx_rng-test.c:211:test_continuous_runs:
assertion failed (calc_runs_p(buf.l, sizeof(buf) * BITS_PER_BYTE) >
0.01): (0.00198053202 > 0.01)


Are these just "we got a bit unlucky in the values we got from
the RNG" ?

If so, we probably need to disable these tests from the set
that we run in "make check" -- we can't really have "there's
a non-zero chance that the test fails" tests in our CI loop...

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]