[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hw/rtc/m48t59: Simplify m48t59_init()
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hw/rtc/m48t59: Simplify m48t59_init() |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Oct 2020 23:18:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
Le 30/09/2020 à 13:25, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
> Le 14/09/2020 à 12:24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
>> As the 'io_base' argument of m48t59_init() is unused (set to 0),
>> remove it to simplify.
>> To create a device on the ISA bus, m48t59_init_isa() is the
>> preferred function to use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>> ---
>> include/hw/rtc/m48t59.h | 2 +-
>> hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c | 2 +-
>> hw/rtc/m48t59.c | 10 ++--------
>> hw/sparc/sun4m.c | 2 +-
>> hw/sparc64/sun4u.c | 2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/rtc/m48t59.h b/include/hw/rtc/m48t59.h
>> index 04abedf3b2b..62297ee0db1 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/rtc/m48t59.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/rtc/m48t59.h
>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct NvramClass {
>> Nvram *m48t59_init_isa(ISABus *bus, uint32_t io_base, uint16_t size,
>> int base_year, int type);
>> Nvram *m48t59_init(qemu_irq IRQ, hwaddr mem_base,
>> - uint32_t io_base, uint16_t size, int base_year,
>> + uint16_t size, int base_year,
>> int type);
>>
>> #endif /* HW_M48T59_H */
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c b/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c
>> index 6198ec1035b..93ffee801a3 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/ppc405_boards.c
>> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static void ref405ep_init(MachineState *machine)
>> /* Register FPGA */
>> ref405ep_fpga_init(sysmem, 0xF0300000);
>> /* Register NVRAM */
>> - m48t59_init(NULL, 0xF0000000, 0, 8192, 1968, 8);
>> + m48t59_init(NULL, 0xF0000000, 8192, 1968, 8);
>> /* Load kernel */
>> linux_boot = (kernel_filename != NULL);
>> if (linux_boot) {
>> diff --git a/hw/rtc/m48t59.c b/hw/rtc/m48t59.c
>> index 6525206976b..2d6a095c4e4 100644
>> --- a/hw/rtc/m48t59.c
>> +++ b/hw/rtc/m48t59.c
>> @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ const MemoryRegionOps m48t59_io_ops = {
>>
>> /* Initialisation routine */
>> Nvram *m48t59_init(qemu_irq IRQ, hwaddr mem_base,
>> - uint32_t io_base, uint16_t size, int base_year,
>> + uint16_t size, int base_year,
>> int model)
>> {
>> DeviceState *dev;
>> @@ -584,13 +584,7 @@ Nvram *m48t59_init(qemu_irq IRQ, hwaddr mem_base,
>> s = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
>> sysbus_realize_and_unref(s, &error_fatal);
>> sysbus_connect_irq(s, 0, IRQ);
>> - if (io_base != 0) {
>> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_io(), io_base,
>> - sysbus_mmio_get_region(s, 1));
>> - }
>> - if (mem_base != 0) {
You can't remove the "if ()"...
>> - sysbus_mmio_map(s, 0, mem_base);
>> - }
>> + sysbus_mmio_map(s, 0, mem_base);
>>
>> return NVRAM(s);
>> }
>> diff --git a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> index 947b69d1597..56a0d38f274 100644
>> --- a/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> +++ b/hw/sparc/sun4m.c
>> @@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static void sun4m_hw_init(const struct sun4m_hwdef
>> *hwdef,
>> create_unimplemented_device("SUNW,sx", hwdef->sx_base, 0x2000);
>> }
>>
>> - nvram = m48t59_init(slavio_irq[0], hwdef->nvram_base, 0, 0x2000, 1968,
>> 8);
>> + nvram = m48t59_init(slavio_irq[0], hwdef->nvram_base, 0x2000, 1968, 8);
>>
>> slavio_timer_init_all(hwdef->counter_base, slavio_irq[19],
>> slavio_cpu_irq, smp_cpus);
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c
>> index b4aabfc076f..1cc57b030a7 100644
>> --- a/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c
>> +++ b/hw/sparc64/sun4u.c
>> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static void sun4uv_init(MemoryRegion *address_space_mem,
>> pci_ide_create_devs(pci_dev);
>>
>> /* Map NVRAM into I/O (ebus) space */
>> - nvram = m48t59_init(NULL, 0, 0, NVRAM_SIZE, 1968, 59);
>> + nvram = m48t59_init(NULL, 0, NVRAM_SIZE, 1968, 59);
... because mem_base is 0 here.
>> s = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(nvram);
>> memory_region_add_subregion(pci_address_space_io(ebus), 0x2000,
>> sysbus_mmio_get_region(s, 0));
>>
>
> Applied to my trivial-patches branch.
I'm removing it from my branch because it breaks check-qtest-sparc64:
Running test qtest-sparc64: endianness-test
qemu-system-sparc64: ../../../Projects/qemu/softmmu/memory.c:2398:
memory_region_add_subregion_common: Assertion `!subregion->container'
failed.
Thanks,
Laurent
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH] hw/rtc/m48t59: Simplify m48t59_init(),
Laurent Vivier <=