[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] target/i386/cpu: Restrict some of feature-words uses
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] target/i386/cpu: Restrict some of feature-words uses to system-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:57:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
On 10/1/20 5:37 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 05:27:32PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 10/1/20 5:14 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 01/10/20 16:41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> The feature-words properties are not used in user-mode emulation,
>>>> restrict it to system-mode.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> This seems a bit pointless honestly. It's going to be a few KBs of code
>>> at most. I would end the work with the patches that have already been
>>> queued.
>>
>> I'll let Eduardo and you discuss that, as he suggested the #ifdef
>> instead of the stub. The two options are on the list, whichever
>> you guys prefer :)
>
> Having neither the stub or the #ifdef is even better. :)
>
> I assumed the stub was necessary as a means for an end, but now I
> don't understand why the stub was necessary in the first place.
x86_cpu_get_feature_words() calls QAPI-generated
visit_type_X86CPUFeatureWordInfoList().
Since "Only qemu-system-FOO and qemu-storage-daemon provide QMP
monitors", this code is unreachable on user-mode.
I tried to get a "no ifdef/no stub" codebase by not removing the
QAPI uses from user-mode code, and build it without QAPI-generated
files. I could only start the work and realized it is a huge effort.
In particular since nobody sees the point of doing this cleanup...
Regards,
Phil.
[PATCH v4 3/3] target/i386: Restrict X86CPUFeatureWord to X86 targets, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2020/10/01