[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] vhost-user-blk: fix the migration issue and enhance q
From: |
Dima Stepanov |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] vhost-user-blk: fix the migration issue and enhance qtests |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:48:38 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:13:09AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:48:28AM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 07:26:14AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:39:42AM +0300, Dima Stepanov wrote:
> > > > v4 -> v5:
> > > > - vhost: check queue state in the vhost_dev_set_log routine
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: prepare the tests for adding new
> > > > dev class
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add support for the
> > > > vhost-user-blk device
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add migrate_reconnect test
> > > > Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz
> > > > - Update qtest, by merging vhost-user-blk "if" case with the
> > > > virtio-blk case.
> > >
> > > I dropped patches 3-7 since they were stalling on some systems.
> > > Pls work with Peter Maydell (cc'd) to figure it out.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Peter, can you share any details for the stalling errors with me?
>
> I can say for sure that even on x86/linux the affected tests take
> much longer to run with these applied.
> I'd suggest making sure there are no timeouts involved in the good case ....
Could you help me to reproduce it? Because on my system i see only 10+ seconds
increase for the qos-test set to pass (both x86_64 and i386). So on the
current master i'm running it like:
- ./configure --target-list="x86_64-softmmu i386-softmmu"
- with no patch set:
time QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
./build/tests/qtest/qos-test
real 0m6.394s
user 0m3.643s
sys 0m3.477s
- without patch 7 (where i include vhost-user-net tests also):
real 0m9.955s
user 0m4.133s
sys 0m4.397s
- full patch set:
real 0m17.263s
user 0m4.530s
sys 0m4.802s
For i386 target i see pretty the same numbers:
time QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/i386-softmmu/qemu-system-i386
./build/tests/qtest/qos-test
real 0m17.386s
user 0m4.503s
sys 0m4.911s
So it looks like that i'm missing some step to reproduce an issue.
And if i run the exact test it takes ~2-3s to pass:
$ time QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=./build/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
./build/tests/qtest/qos-test -p
/x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/vhost-user-blk-pci/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk-tests/reconnect
/x86_64/pc/i440FX-pcihost/pci-bus-pc/pci-bus/vhost-user-blk-pci/vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk-tests/reconnect:
OK
real 0m2.253s
user 0m0.118s
sys 0m0.104s
And same numbers for i386.
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > v3 -> v4:
> > > > - vhost: recheck dev state in the vhost_migration_log routine
> > > > Reviewed-by: Raphael Norwitz
> > > > - vhost: check queue state in the vhost_dev_set_log routine
> > > > Use "continue" instead of "break" to handle non-initialized
> > > > virtqueue case.
> > > >
> > > > v2 -> v3:
> > > > - update commit message for the
> > > > "vhost: recheck dev state in the vhost_migration_log routine" commit
> > > > - rename "started" field of the VhostUserBlk structure to
> > > > "started_vu", so there will be no confustion with the VHOST started
> > > > field
> > > > - update vhost-user-test.c to always initialize nq local variable
> > > > (spotted by patchew)
> > > >
> > > > v1 -> v2:
> > > > - add comments to connected/started fields in the header file
> > > > - move the "s->started" logic from the vhost_user_blk_disconnect
> > > > routine to the vhost_user_blk_stop routine
> > > >
> > > > Reference e-mail threads:
> > > > - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg01509.html
> > > > - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg05241.html
> > > >
> > > > If vhost-user daemon is used as a backend for the vhost device, then we
> > > > should consider a possibility of disconnect at any moment. There was a
> > > > general
> > > > question here: should we consider it as an error or okay state for the
> > > > vhost-user
> > > > devices during migration process?
> > > > I think the disconnect event for the vhost-user devices should not
> > > > break the
> > > > migration process, because:
> > > > - the device will be in the stopped state, so it will not be changed
> > > > during migration
> > > > - if reconnect will be made the migration log will be reinitialized as
> > > > part of reconnect/init process:
> > > > #0 vhost_log_global_start (listener=0x563989cf7be0)
> > > > at hw/virtio/vhost.c:920
> > > > #1 0x000056398603d8bc in listener_add_address_space
> > > > (listener=0x563989cf7be0,
> > > > as=0x563986ea4340 <address_space_memory>)
> > > > at softmmu/memory.c:2664
> > > > #2 0x000056398603dd30 in memory_listener_register
> > > > (listener=0x563989cf7be0,
> > > > as=0x563986ea4340 <address_space_memory>)
> > > > at softmmu/memory.c:2740
> > > > #3 0x0000563985fd6956 in vhost_dev_init (hdev=0x563989cf7bd8,
> > > > opaque=0x563989cf7e30, backend_type=VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER,
> > > > busyloop_timeout=0)
> > > > at hw/virtio/vhost.c:1385
> > > > #4 0x0000563985f7d0b8 in vhost_user_blk_connect
> > > > (dev=0x563989cf7990)
> > > > at hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c:315
> > > > #5 0x0000563985f7d3f6 in vhost_user_blk_event
> > > > (opaque=0x563989cf7990,
> > > > event=CHR_EVENT_OPENED)
> > > > at hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c:379
> > > > The first patch in the patchset fixes this issue by setting vhost
> > > > device to the
> > > > stopped state in the disconnect handler and check it the
> > > > vhost_migration_log()
> > > > routine before returning from the function.
> > > > qtest framework was updated to test vhost-user-blk functionality. The
> > > > vhost-user-blk/vhost-user-blk-tests/migrate_reconnect test was added to
> > > > reproduce
> > > > the original issue found.
> > > >
> > > > Dima Stepanov (7):
> > > > vhost: recheck dev state in the vhost_migration_log routine
> > > > vhost: check queue state in the vhost_dev_set_log routine
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: prepare the tests for adding new dev
> > > > class
> > > > tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk: add support for vhost-user-blk
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add support for the vhost-user-blk device
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add migrate_reconnect test
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: enable the reconnect tests
> > > >
> > > > hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c | 19 ++-
> > > > hw/virtio/vhost.c | 39 ++++-
> > > > include/hw/virtio/vhost-user-blk.h | 10 ++
> > > > tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c | 14 +-
> > > > tests/qtest/vhost-user-test.c | 290
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > > 5 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.7.4
> > >
>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk: add support for vhost-user-blk, (continued)
[PATCH v5 5/7] tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add support for the vhost-user-blk device, Dima Stepanov, 2020/09/11
[PATCH v5 6/7] tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: add migrate_reconnect test, Dima Stepanov, 2020/09/11
[PATCH v5 7/7] tests/qtest/vhost-user-test: enable the reconnect tests, Dima Stepanov, 2020/09/11
Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] vhost-user-blk: fix the migration issue and enhance qtests, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2020/09/24