[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary
From: |
Christian Ehrhardt |
Subject: |
[Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Sep 2020 06:09:19 -0000 |
SRU Template for qemu added and MP linked to fix this in Ubuntu 20.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849644
Title:
QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol
Status in QEMU:
Fix Released
Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in qemu source package in Focal:
In Progress
Bug description:
[Impact]
* The exact details of the protocol/subprotocal was slightly unclear
between the projects. So qemu ended up insisting on "binary" being
used but newer noVNC clients no more used it.
* Qemu got fixed in 5.0 to be more tolerant and accept an empty sub-
protocol as well. This SRU backports that fix to Focal.
[Test Case]
* Without the fix the following will "Failed to connect", but with
the fix it will work.
$ sudo apt install qemu-system-x86
# will only boot into a failing bootloader, but that is enough
$ qemu-system-x86_64 -vnc :0,websocket
# We need version 1.2 or later, so use the snap
$ snap install novnc
$ novnc --vnc localhost:5700
Connect browser to http://<IP>:6080/vnc.html
Click "Connect"
* Cross check with an older noVNC (e.g. the one in Focal) if the
connectivity still works on those as well
- Reminders when switching between the noVNC implementations
- always refresh the browser with all clear ctrl+alt+f5
- start/stop the snapped one via snap.novnc.novncsvc.service
[Regression Potential]
* This is exclusive to the functionality of noVNC, so regressions would
have to be expected in there. The tests try to exercise the basics, but
e.g. Openstack would be a major product using
[Other Info]
* The noVNC in Focal itself does not yet have the offending change, but
we want the qemu in focal to be connecteable from ~any type of client
---
When running a machine using "-vnc" and the "websocket" option QEMU seems to
require the subprotocol called 'binary'. This subprotocol does not exist in the
WebSocket specification. In fact it has never existed in the spec, in one of
the very early drafts of WebSockets it was briefly mentioned but it never made
it to a final version.
When the WebSocket server requires a non-standard subprotocol any
WebSocket client that works correctly won't be able to connect.
One example of such a client is noVNC, it tells the server that it
doesn't want to use any subprotocol. QEMU's WebSocket proxy doesn't
let noVNC connect. If noVNC is modified to ask for 'binary' it will
work, this is, however, incorrect behavior.
Looking at the code in "io/channel-websock.c" it seems it's quite
hard-coded to binary:
Look at line 58 and 433 here:
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=io/channel-websock.c
This code has to be made more dynamic, and shouldn't require binary.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1849644/+subscriptions
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol, Christian Ehrhardt , 2020/09/24
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol, Christian Ehrhardt , 2020/09/24
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol, Christian Ehrhardt , 2020/09/24
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol, Christian Ehrhardt , 2020/09/25
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol, Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020/09/25
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol,
Christian Ehrhardt <=
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol, Robie Basak, 2020/09/29
- [Bug 1849644] Re: QEMU VNC websocket proxy requires non-standard 'binary' subprotocol, Christian Ehrhardt , 2020/09/30