qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] qom: code hardening - have bound checking while looping with


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qom: code hardening - have bound checking while looping with integer value
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:25:49 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11)

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 09:11:39PM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> Object property insertion code iterates over an integer to get an unused
> index that can be used as an unique name for an object property. This loop
> increments the integer value indefinitely. Although very unlikely, this can
> still cause an integer overflow.
> In this change, we fix the above code by checking against INT_MAX and making
> sure that the interger index does not overflow beyond that value. If no
> available index is found, the code would cause an assertion failure. This
> assertion failure is necessary because the callers of the function do not 
> check
> the return value for NULL.

If we're going to put a limit on the loop, then lets at least make it a
sensible real world limit. INT_MAX is insanely large, as a per-object
property count limit, we won't get within many orders of magnitude of
that.

Even INT8_MAX is probably large enough, but just in case someone has
a valid reason for 255 properties, INT16_MAX gives breathing space.
If someone needs 65535 properties on a single obj I'd call it a design
flaw.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
> ---
>  qom/object.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> index 00fdf89b3b..62414da67f 100644
> --- a/qom/object.c
> +++ b/qom/object.c
> @@ -1158,11 +1158,11 @@ object_property_try_add(Object *obj, const char 
> *name, const char *type,
>  
>      if (name_len >= 3 && !memcmp(name + name_len - 3, "[*]", 4)) {
>          int i;
> -        ObjectProperty *ret;
> +        ObjectProperty *ret = NULL;
>          char *name_no_array = g_strdup(name);
>  
>          name_no_array[name_len - 3] = '\0';
> -        for (i = 0; ; ++i) {
> +        for (i = 0; i < INT_MAX; ++i) {
>              char *full_name = g_strdup_printf("%s[%d]", name_no_array, i);
>  
>              ret = object_property_try_add(obj, full_name, type, get, set,
> @@ -1173,6 +1173,7 @@ object_property_try_add(Object *obj, const char *name, 
> const char *type,
>              }
>          }
>          g_free(name_no_array);
> +        assert(ret);
>          return ret;
>      }
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]