|
From: | Ying Fang |
Subject: | Re: [RFC PATCH 09/12] target/arm/cpu: Add CPU cache description for arm |
Date: | Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:11:06 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 9/17/2020 4:39 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:20:30AM +0800, Ying Fang wrote:Add the CPUCacheInfo structure to hold CPU cache information for ARM cpus. A classic three level cache topology is used here. The default cache capacity is given and userspace can overwrite these values.Doesn't TCG already have some sort of fake cache hierarchy? If so, then
TCG may have some sort of fake cache hierarchy via CCSIDR.
we shouldn't be adding another one, we should be simply describing the one we already have. For KVM, we shouldn't describe anything other than what is actually on the host.
Yes, I agreed. Cache capacity should be the with host otherwise it may have bad impact on guest performance, we can do that by query from the host and make cache capacity configurable from userspace. Dario Faggioli is going to give a talk about it in KVM forum [1].[1] https://kvmforum2020.sched.com/event/eE1y/virtual-topology-for-virtual-machines-friend-or-foe-dario-faggioli-suse?iframe=no&w=100%&sidebar=yes&bg=no
Thanks.
drew .
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |