[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] hw/arm/virt: spe: Add SPE fdt binding for virt mach
From: |
Andrew Jones |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] hw/arm/virt: spe: Add SPE fdt binding for virt machine |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:16:25 +0200 |
This patch does much more than the summary "hw/arm/virt: spe: Add SPE fdt
binding for virt machine" says it does. Please revise the summary.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 08:13:27AM +0000, Haibo Xu wrote:
> Add a virtual SPE device for virt machine while using
> PPI 5 for SPE overflow interrupt number which has already
> selected in kvmtool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 3 +++
> hw/arm/virt.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h | 3 +++
> include/hw/arm/virt.h | 1 +
> target/arm/cpu.c | 2 ++
> target/arm/cpu.h | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 9efd7a3881..3fd80fda53 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -665,6 +665,9 @@ build_madt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> VirtMachineState *vms)
> if (arm_feature(&armcpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_PMU)) {
> gicc->performance_interrupt = cpu_to_le32(PPI(VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ));
> }
> + if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_spe, armcpu)) {
> + gicc->spe_interrupt = cpu_to_le32(PPI(VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ));
> + }
> if (vms->virt) {
> gicc->vgic_interrupt = cpu_to_le32(PPI(ARCH_GIC_MAINT_IRQ));
> }
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 6bacfb668d..bdb1ce925c 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,32 @@ static void fdt_add_pmu_nodes(const VirtMachineState
> *vms)
> }
> }
>
> +static void fdt_add_spe_nodes(const VirtMachineState *vms)
> +{
> + ARMCPU *armcpu = ARM_CPU(first_cpu);
> + uint32_t irqflags = GIC_FDT_IRQ_FLAGS_LEVEL_HI;
> +
> + if (!cpu_isar_feature(aa64_spe, armcpu)) {
> + assert(!object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(armcpu), "spe", NULL));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (vms->gic_version == VIRT_GIC_VERSION_2) {
> + irqflags = deposit32(irqflags, GIC_FDT_IRQ_PPI_CPU_START,
> + GIC_FDT_IRQ_PPI_CPU_WIDTH,
> + (1 << vms->smp_cpus) - 1);
> + }
> +
> + qemu_fdt_add_subnode(vms->fdt, "/spe");
> + if (arm_feature(&armcpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V8)) {
> + const char compat[] = "arm,statistical-profiling-extension-v1";
> + qemu_fdt_setprop(vms->fdt, "/spe", "compatible",
> + compat, sizeof(compat));
> + qemu_fdt_setprop_cells(vms->fdt, "/spe", "interrupts",
> + GIC_FDT_IRQ_TYPE_PPI, VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ,
> irqflags);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static inline DeviceState *create_acpi_ged(VirtMachineState *vms)
> {
> DeviceState *dev;
> @@ -717,6 +743,10 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms)
> qdev_get_gpio_in(vms->gic, ppibase
> + VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ));
>
> + qdev_connect_gpio_out_named(cpudev, "spe-interrupt", 0,
> + qdev_get_gpio_in(vms->gic, ppibase
> + + VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ));
> +
> sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i, qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev,
> ARM_CPU_IRQ));
> sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + smp_cpus,
> qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_FIQ));
> @@ -1664,11 +1694,12 @@ static void finalize_gic_version(VirtMachineState
> *vms)
>
> static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms)
> {
> - bool aarch64, pmu;
> + bool aarch64, pmu, spe;
> CPUState *cpu;
>
> aarch64 = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "aarch64", NULL);
> pmu = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "pmu", NULL);
> + spe = object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(first_cpu), "spe", NULL);
>
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> CPU_FOREACH(cpu) {
> @@ -1679,6 +1710,14 @@ static void virt_cpu_post_init(VirtMachineState *vms)
> }
> kvm_arm_pmu_init(cpu);
> }
> +
> + if (spe) {
> + assert(ARM_CPU(cpu)->has_spe == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON);
> + if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> + kvm_arm_spe_set_irq(cpu, PPI(VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ));
> + }
> + kvm_arm_spe_init(cpu);
A later patch introduces userspace irqchip support. Should we avoid
allowing it until then to avoid breaking bisection?
> + }
> }
> } else {
> if (aarch64 && vms->highmem) {
> @@ -1927,6 +1966,8 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>
> fdt_add_pmu_nodes(vms);
>
> + fdt_add_spe_nodes(vms);
> +
> create_uart(vms, VIRT_UART, sysmem, serial_hd(0));
>
> if (vms->secure) {
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> index 38a42f409a..21e58f27c5 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h
> @@ -302,6 +302,9 @@ struct AcpiMadtGenericCpuInterface {
> uint32_t vgic_interrupt;
> uint64_t gicr_base_address;
> uint64_t arm_mpidr;
> + uint8_t efficiency_class;
> + uint8_t reserved2[1];
> + uint16_t spe_interrupt; /* ACPI 6.3 */
> } QEMU_PACKED;
>
> typedef struct AcpiMadtGenericCpuInterface AcpiMadtGenericCpuInterface;
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/virt.h b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> index 72c269aaa5..6013b6d535 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/virt.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> #define ARCH_TIMER_NS_EL1_IRQ 14
> #define ARCH_TIMER_NS_EL2_IRQ 10
>
> +#define VIRTUAL_SPE_IRQ 5
> #define VIRTUAL_PMU_IRQ 7
>
> #define PPI(irq) ((irq) + 16)
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index f211958eaa..786cc6134c 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> @@ -1041,6 +1041,8 @@ static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
> "gicv3-maintenance-interrupt", 1);
> qdev_init_gpio_out_named(DEVICE(cpu), &cpu->pmu_interrupt,
> "pmu-interrupt", 1);
> + qdev_init_gpio_out_named(DEVICE(cpu), &cpu->spe_interrupt,
> + "spe-interrupt", 1);
> #endif
>
> /* DTB consumers generally don't in fact care what the 'compatible'
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index baf2bbcee8..395a1e5df8 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -800,6 +800,8 @@ struct ARMCPU {
> qemu_irq gicv3_maintenance_interrupt;
> /* GPIO output for the PMU interrupt */
> qemu_irq pmu_interrupt;
> + /* GPIO output for the SPE interrupt */
> + qemu_irq spe_interrupt;
>
> /* MemoryRegion to use for secure physical accesses */
> MemoryRegion *secure_memory;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] target/arm/kvm: spe: Unify device attr operation helper, (continued)
[PATCH v2 08/12] hw/arm/virt: Move kvm pmu setup to virt_cpu_post_init, Haibo Xu, 2020/09/08
[PATCH v2 10/12] target/arm/cpu: spe: Enable spe to work with host cpu, Haibo Xu, 2020/09/08
[PATCH v2 11/12] target/arm/kvm: spe: Enable userspace irqchip support., Haibo Xu, 2020/09/08