Re: [PATCH 0/2] qapi: A section heading bug fix, and maybe an improvement

[Markus Armbruster]

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 15:41, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > PATCH 1 fixes an old defect in the doc comment parser.  I figure it'll
>> > simplify the rST generator's job.
>> >
>> > PATCH 2 might simplify it further.  It's RFC because I'm not sure it
>> > does.  Peter, you tell me :)
>>
>> I dropped the ball on this one.  I think both patches make sense, but I
>> don't want to upset Peter's "Convert QAPI doc comments to generate rST
>> instead of texinfo" apple cart.  Peter, please tell me what you'd like
>> me to do:
>>
>> * Post a pull request, so you can base your v6 on it.
>
> Looking back at my comments on the patches I think I was happy
> with both and it probably isn't a huge rebase issue, so you
> might as well send these in a pullreq. You might consider also
> including the first 3 patches from my v5 series, which are just
> fixing markup issues in the .json that get detected by the
> rst conversion.

Good idea, will do.