[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions w
From: |
Taylor Simpson |
Subject: |
RE: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:30:13 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 3:13 PM
> To: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: philmd@redhat.com; laurent@vivier.eu; riku.voipio@iki.fi;
> aleksandar.m.mail@gmail.com; ale@rev.ng
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for
> instructions with multiple definitions
>
> On 8/30/20 12:48 PM, Taylor Simpson wrote:
> > I'll add the following comment to indicate what's going on
> >
> > /*
> > * Each of the generated helpers is wrapped with #ifndef
> fGEN_TCG_<tag>.
> > * For example
> > * #ifndef fGEN_TCG_A2_add
> > * DEF_HELPER_3(A2_add, s32, env, s32, s32)
> > * #endif
> > * We include gen_tcg.h here to provide definitions of fGEN_TCG for any
> instructions that
> > * are overridden.
> > *
> > * This prevents unused helpers from taking up space in the executable.
> > */
>
> Ah, hum. Well.
>
> How about we figure out a way to communicate to the generator scripts
> which
> functions have been implemented "directly", and don't need to be
> generated at all?
>
> I don't see why we have to wait until the c preprocessor to remove this
> unused
> code, and the less we have of it, the better.
>
A few reasons
- Makes it easy to override instruction helpers. All one has to do is #define
fGEN_TCG_<tag>.
- When debugging the override, sometimes you want to quickly revert back to the
helper. Or if you've written a bunch of overrides in one shot and then find
that a test case is failing, you can binary search which one to turn off and
get the test to pass. This is the one with the bug to fix.
- Reduces time for an incremental build. When we add or delete an override, we
don't have to re-run the generator.
- RE: [RFC PATCH v3 27/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) instruction classes, (continued)
[RFC PATCH v3 21/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) generator phase 2 - generate header files, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/18
[RFC PATCH v3 22/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) generator phase 3 - C preprocessor for decode tree, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/18
[RFC PATCH v3 32/34] Hexagon (linux-user/hexagon) Linux user emulation, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/18
[RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/18
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Richard Henderson, 2020/08/28
- RE: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/30
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Richard Henderson, 2020/08/30
- RE: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions,
Taylor Simpson <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Richard Henderson, 2020/08/30
- RE: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Richard Henderson, 2020/08/31
- RE: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Richard Henderson, 2020/08/31
- RE: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/31
- Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/34] Hexagon (target/hexagon) TCG for instructions with multiple definitions, Richard Henderson, 2020/08/31
[RFC PATCH v3 33/34] Hexagon (tests/tcg/hexagon) TCG tests, Taylor Simpson, 2020/08/18
Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/34] Hexagon patch series, no-reply, 2020/08/18