qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 07/18] hw/sd: sd: Fix incorrect populated function switch sta


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] hw/sd: sd: Fix incorrect populated function switch status data structure
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:58:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

+Sai Pavan

On 8/14/20 6:40 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> 
> At present the function switch status data structure bit [399:376]
> are wrongly pupulated. These 3 bytes encode function switch status
> for the 6 function groups, with 4 bits per group, starting from
> function group 6 at bit 399, then followed by function group 5 at
> bit 395, and so on.
> 
> However the codes mistakenly fills in the function group 1 status
> at bit 399. This fixes the code logic.
> 

Fixes: a1bb27b1e9 ("SD card emulation (initial implementation)")

> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>
> ---
> 
>  hw/sd/sd.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index fad9cf1..51f5900 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -806,11 +806,15 @@ static void sd_function_switch(SDState *sd, uint32_t 
> arg)
>      sd->data[11] = 0x43;
>      sd->data[12] = 0x80;     /* Supported group 1 functions */
>      sd->data[13] = 0x03;
> +
> +    sd->data[14] = 0;
> +    sd->data[15] = 0;
> +    sd->data[16] = 0;

Pointless zero initialization.

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

I'll wait until next week in case Sai Pavan wants to test this
patch (I don't have access to the Xilinx images anymore) then
I'll queue this via my sd-next tree.

Regards,

Phil.

>      for (i = 0; i < 6; i ++) {
>          new_func = (arg >> (i * 4)) & 0x0f;
>          if (mode && new_func != 0x0f)
>              sd->function_group[i] = new_func;
> -        sd->data[14 + (i >> 1)] = new_func << ((i * 4) & 4);
> +        sd->data[16 - (i >> 1)] |= new_func << ((i % 2) * 4);
>      }
>      memset(&sd->data[17], 0, 47);
>      stw_be_p(sd->data + 64, sd_crc16(sd->data, 64));
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]