qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi


From: Maxim Levitsky
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Fix scsi devices plug/unplug races w.r.t virtio-scsi iothread
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:26:21 +0300
User-agent: Evolution 3.36.3 (3.36.3-1.fc32)

On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 18:01 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> This is a patch series that is a result of my discussion with Paulo on
> how to correctly fix the root cause of the BZ #1812399.
> 
> The root cause of this bug is the fact that IO thread is running mostly
> unlocked versus main thread on which device hotplug is done.
> 
> qdev_device_add first creates the device object, then places it on the bus,
> and only then realizes it.
> 
> However some drivers and currently only virtio-scsi enumerate its child bus
> devices on each request that is received from the guest and that can happen 
> on the IO
> thread.
> 
> Thus we have a window when new device is on the bus but not realized and can 
> be accessed
> by the virtio-scsi driver in that state.
> 
> Fix that by doing two things:
> 
> 1. Add partial RCU protection to the list of a bus's child devices.
> This allows the scsi IO thread to safely enumerate the child devices
> while it races with the hotplug placing the device on the bus.
> 
> 2. Make the virtio-scsi driver check .realized property of the scsi device
> and avoid touching the device if it isn't
> 
> Note that in the particular bug report the issue wasn't a race but rather due
> to combination of things, the .realize code in the middle managed to trigger 
> IO on the virtqueue
> which caused the virtio-scsi driver to access the half realized device. 
> However
> since this can happen as well with real IO thread, this patch series was done,
> which fixes this as well.
> 
> Changes from V1:
>   * Patch 2 is new, as suggested by Stefan, added drain_call_rcu() to fix the 
> failing unit test,
>     make check pass now
> 
>   * Patches 6,7 are new as well: I added scsi_device_get as suggested by 
> Stefan as well, although
>     this is more a refactoring that anything else as it doesn't solve
>     an existing race.
> 
>   * Addressed most of the review feedback from V1
>     - still need to decide if we need QTAILQ_FOREACH_WITH_RCU_READ_LOCK
> 
> Changes from V2:
> 
>   * No longer RFC
>   * Addressed most of the feedback from Stefan
>   * Fixed reference count leak in patch 7 when device is about to be 
> unrealized
>   * Better testing
> 
> This series was tested by adding a virtio-scsi drive with iothread,
> then running fio stress job in the guest in a loop, and then adding/removing
> the scsi drive on the host in the loop.
> This test was failing usually on 1st iteration withouth this patch series,
> and now it seems to work smoothly.
> 
> Best regards,
>       Maxim Levitsky
> 
> Maxim Levitsky (7):
>   scsi/scsi_bus: switch search direction in scsi_device_find
>   Implement drain_call_rcu and use it in hmp_device_del
>   device-core: use RCU for list of childs of a bus
>   device-core: use atomic_set on .realized property
>   virtio-scsi: don't touch scsi devices that are not yet realized or
>     about to be un-realized
>   scsi: Add scsi_device_get
>   virtio-scsi: use scsi_device_get
> 
>  hw/core/bus.c          | 28 +++++++++++++--------
>  hw/core/qdev.c         | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c     | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  hw/scsi/virtio-scsi.c  | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/hw/qdev-core.h | 11 +++++++++
>  include/hw/scsi/scsi.h |  2 ++
>  include/qemu/rcu.h     |  1 +
>  qdev-monitor.c         | 22 +++++++++++++++++
>  util/rcu.c             | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  9 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 

Seems that this patch series doesn't have any disagreeements, so
anybody wants to put it on an maintainer's tree, now that the freeze is over?

Best regards,
        Maxim Levitsky





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]