Re: sysbus_create_simple Vs qdev_create

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:54:35AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 29/07/20 00:47, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
> > Do we really need need QOM children to be accessible using the QOM
> > property API?
> > 
> > Using the same code for both user-configurable properties and for
> > the list of children of a QOM object might have saved some time
> > years ago, but I'm not sure this is still a necessary or useful
> > abstraction.
> 
> The main thing we get from it is that the QOM paths treat children and
> links the same, and links are properties.  To be honest it's not a
> feature that is very much developed, so perhaps we can remove it but we
> need to evaluate the impact of losing it.

Are link properties usable by -device/device_add/-object/object-add?

-- 
Eduardo